dw7
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Appeal lose 4 game ban instead of 3 everyone's a winner
Appeal lose 4 game ban instead of 3 everyone's a winner
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nasri Appeal (merged).
- Thread starter mancity1
- Start date
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
The act, pathetic as it was, was violent. If you throw a punch and miss, it's violence. If you flick your head when your head to head, it could technically be regarded as violent conduct. I think its pointless contesting but maybe the ref might have 2nd thoughts when he sees the video
I have been arguing this, and come round to the view that there's no point appealingmoomba said:Remember a similar one by Lee Hendrie against us. No contact and probably wouldn't have hurt if he did make contact.
But the appeal failed, ours will too.
The act, pathetic as it was, was violent. If you throw a punch and miss, it's violence. If you flick your head when your head to head, it could technically be regarded as violent conduct. I think its pointless contesting but maybe the ref might have 2nd thoughts when he sees the video
Danny Hoekman
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Violent conduct?? Are you lot having a laugh? Private school education I assume. If that is a 3 game ban, then I must live in a different place. What a pathetic game is now played in front of us.
Violent conduct?? Are you lot having a laugh? Private school education I assume. If that is a 3 game ban, then I must live in a different place. What a pathetic game is now played in front of us.
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Rather than appealing Nasri's ban the club should be fining him for unprofessional behaviour that could have cost us the game. What he did was stupid and a certain red in today's game. No point appealing. I hope Mancini gave him a total bollocking after the match.
Rather than appealing Nasri's ban the club should be fining him for unprofessional behaviour that could have cost us the game. What he did was stupid and a certain red in today's game. No point appealing. I hope Mancini gave him a total bollocking after the match.
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Yes violent....Danny Hoekman said:Violent conduct?? Are you lot having a laugh? Private school education I assume. If that is a 3 game ban, then I must live in a different place. What a pathetic game is now played in front of us.
dw7
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Get away with whatTrain said:Its about principle, cant let them get away with double standards either so yes, we should appeal even if it costs us one extra game.
D
D
Deleted member 52846
Guest
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
It's a cautionable offence for this part of the Cautionable Offence law; "Commits an act which, in the opinion of the referee, shows a lack of respect for the game (e.g., aggressive attitude, inflammatory behavior, or taunting)".
It's aggressive attitude and inflammatory behaviour with a lack of respect. It was not violence.
That's what I've been saying. If that is violence I give up on this as a sport played by men. May as well start promoting it as "Wendyball" like a lot of rugby players call the sport.Danny Hoekman said:Violent conduct?? Are you lot having a laugh? Private school education I assume. If that is a 3 game ban, then I must live in a different place. What a pathetic game is now played in front of us.
It's a cautionable offence for this part of the Cautionable Offence law; "Commits an act which, in the opinion of the referee, shows a lack of respect for the game (e.g., aggressive attitude, inflammatory behavior, or taunting)".
It's aggressive attitude and inflammatory behaviour with a lack of respect. It was not violence.
Blue Tooth
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Movement of the head will lose him the appeal so leave it alone.
Movement of the head will lose him the appeal so leave it alone.