oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaa.Tiny tears.
Caveman said:
Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaaaa.Tiny tears.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nasri Appeal (merged).
- Thread starter mancity1
- Start date
Allnightlong
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
It's a shame that nasri will get the same ban as fellaini. One was premeditated and one was locking horns in a way.
It's a shame that nasri will get the same ban as fellaini. One was premeditated and one was locking horns in a way.
Ducado
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
ha ha I rember thatoakiecokie said:Jumanji said:It is unfathomable to me how you do not see Nasri's headbutt/swipe as violent. Yes, unfathomable.Caveman said:Violent conduct is violent conduct and I know what violent conduct is. What Nasri did is not violence in real life, other sports or anything.
Is it the worst thing he could have done? Far from it...But to deny it as an act of violence and aggression, when it clearly is, I can't understand.
Think back to "aggresive walking" by Kevin Horlock. ;)
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,616
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Oakie.he cant and wont let it go.He needs to get a grip.If shrek had done this to one of ours we'd be screaming for a red...It was a nothing incident but the forward movement from nasri has doomed our appeal.Move on and get over it caveman.oakiecokie said:Caveman said:What Nasri did was not an act of violence (red card offence), it was an act of aggression or inflammatory behaviour which could have escalated to violence (cautionable offence) but it didn't escalate.BigJoe#1 said:It was a clear red card and he deserved to go.
Take the sky blue tinted specs off and deal with it.
It was a yellow card offence, not red.
He shouldn't have done it, he was silly to do what he did, but that was not violent conduct.
For fucks sake give it a rest.I showed you on two occasions last night that Law 12 covered this act of stupidness,something which his own manager is now saying merited a sending off.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,065
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
He didn't say he thought it was a sending off, he said its not a sending off but if Nasri is sent off then they both should be as they did the same.
If you truly believe actions such as those yesterday should receive reds then you are a humongous fanny.
Fuck me your reasoning is off at times.oakiecokie said:I don`t understand Mancini ref an appeal !! He claims that BOTH players should have walked and not just Samir,something I wholeheartdly agree with.
However in the next breath he says "I am disappointed with Samir and he will pay his fine".
So even Bobby agrees that it WAS a sending off,so why the fuck are we appealing ????
He didn't say he thought it was a sending off, he said its not a sending off but if Nasri is sent off then they both should be as they did the same.
If you truly believe actions such as those yesterday should receive reds then you are a humongous fanny.
Bazzmand Show
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 5,049
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
This is why the current system the FA uses is ridiculous. There should be different levels of "violent conduct", the fact that Nasri will miss the same number of games as Fellaini, despite the fact his was on a different level of violence, is really illogical.
This is why the current system the FA uses is ridiculous. There should be different levels of "violent conduct", the fact that Nasri will miss the same number of games as Fellaini, despite the fact his was on a different level of violence, is really illogical.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
The FArce always want an opportunity to show that they are upholding the rule of law and they don't have any truck with violence on the pitch. This weekend Samir Nasri has given them the perfect opportunity for them to maintain this unequivocal stance! I expect him to get the same treatment as any Rag thug, Rooney included. Well, not quite the same treatment. In fact, nothing like the same treatment. Three games for you Samir and another for luck!
The FArce always want an opportunity to show that they are upholding the rule of law and they don't have any truck with violence on the pitch. This weekend Samir Nasri has given them the perfect opportunity for them to maintain this unequivocal stance! I expect him to get the same treatment as any Rag thug, Rooney included. Well, not quite the same treatment. In fact, nothing like the same treatment. Three games for you Samir and another for luck!
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,065
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
Talking of tears Oakiecokie, you finished crying about your shit threads being moved yet?
But if Rooney or RVp (as he does every week) had done it then they wouldn't have seen a red.St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:Oakie.he cant and wont let it go.He needs to get a grip.If shrek had done this to one of ours we'd be screaming for a red...It was a nothing incident but the forward movement from nasri has doomed our appeal.Move on and get over it caveman.oakiecokie said:Caveman said:What Nasri did was not an act of violence (red card offence), it was an act of aggression or inflammatory behaviour which could have escalated to violence (cautionable offence) but it didn't escalate.
It was a yellow card offence, not red.
He shouldn't have done it, he was silly to do what he did, but that was not violent conduct.
For fucks sake give it a rest.I showed you on two occasions last night that Law 12 covered this act of stupidness,something which his own manager is now saying merited a sending off.
Talking of tears Oakiecokie, you finished crying about your shit threads being moved yet?
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
It'll be a pointless appeal IMO because i think it'll take a miracle for the red to be rescinded. In the circumstances the FA/officials will simply say Nasri was the aggressor, was the one who stuck his forehead into Bassong's and was the one who's subsequent head movement could be classed as violent conduct.
It'll be a pointless appeal IMO because i think it'll take a miracle for the red to be rescinded. In the circumstances the FA/officials will simply say Nasri was the aggressor, was the one who stuck his forehead into Bassong's and was the one who's subsequent head movement could be classed as violent conduct.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Re: Appeal or not? SN.
You need to read what he said and I`ll quote you from two newspapers this morning :
"I am disappointed with Samir.He made a mistake and he will be fined.He said he touched him but the other player did the same.We will appeal but I don`t know if we have a chance"
Straight forward to me SWP.It doesn`t matter one iota what you or I think as Bobby is admitting that it was a sending off,as Samir has admitting touching him (with his head)
So get off your high horse you sanctimonious tart.
SWP's back said:Fuck me your reasoning is off at times.oakiecokie said:I don`t understand Mancini ref an appeal !! He claims that BOTH players should have walked and not just Samir,something I wholeheartdly agree with.
However in the next breath he says "I am disappointed with Samir and he will pay his fine".
So even Bobby agrees that it WAS a sending off,so why the fuck are we appealing ????
He didn't say he thought it was a sending off, he said its not a sending off but if Nasri is sent off then they both should be as they did the same.
If you truly believe actions such as those yesterday should receive reds then you are a humongous fanny.
You need to read what he said and I`ll quote you from two newspapers this morning :
"I am disappointed with Samir.He made a mistake and he will be fined.He said he touched him but the other player did the same.We will appeal but I don`t know if we have a chance"
Straight forward to me SWP.It doesn`t matter one iota what you or I think as Bobby is admitting that it was a sending off,as Samir has admitting touching him (with his head)
So get off your high horse you sanctimonious tart.