Nasri [Merged] continued.

Status
Not open for further replies.
richards30 said:
Ducado said:
Harry Godwin said:
This may have already been posted, but just in case.Football editor of the
Independant tweeted this earlier.



Personally I think it's probably bollocks but if there's even the slightest
bit of truth in it we shouldn't sign him.
It's just mischief making
i thought ladyman got on quite well with us ducado?? obviously not!!!

It's Glenn Moore that tweeted it not Ladyman.

It's bollocks, been said about 80% and shown to be true for none of them.
 
All these people saying he doesn't want to sign now are talking absolute bollocks.... he hasn't gone on wanting to sign for us (as everyone has been reporting for 2 months) and then all of the sudden had a change of heart at the last second... it just baffles me how much hate we get from the rag wanking media. Oh well its just going to make every single one of our victories this year all the more sweet.

P.S. when he signs for us can he also sign a 4/5 year contract or will he only be with us until the end of the season.
 
I thought the talk was the HE turned down United advances, wanting City. now it's that he prefers United?

lolz, don't believe any of this and don't really care. sign him and I'm sure he'll come good.
 
richards30 said:
Ducado said:
Harry Godwin said:
This may have already been posted, but just in case.Football editor of the
Independant tweeted this earlier.



Personally I think it's probably bollocks but if there's even the slightest
bit of truth in it we shouldn't sign him.
It's just mischief making
i thought ladyman got on quite well with us ducado?? obviously not!!!

Ladyman didn't quote it somebody tweeted him an he just retweeted it :) it's a load of bollocks
 
HellasLEAF said:
I thought the talk was the HE turned down United advances, wanting City. now it's that he prefers United?

lolz, don't believe any of this and don't really care. sign him and I'm sure he'll come good.
Totally agree, Didn't Ferguson himself say "He has decided to go elsware" when asked about the possibility of Nasri joining the rags a few monts ago.... in othe words 'He's turned us down and aint coming'.

What part of that statement did the numpty ragtop journos fail to understand?...
 
HellasLEAF said:
I thought the talk was the HE turned down United advances, wanting City. now it's that he prefers United?

lolz, don't believe any of this and don't really care. sign him and I'm sure he'll come good.

It is standard journalism mate. When City take more than 5 minutes to sign a player, it is because the player is holding out for another team to come in for him.
 
The reason they are saying it is they all nailed their colours down when they categorically stated he would be a rag, and we were always interested but he was destined for united.

Turns out they were wrong, so they print stories based on thin air, saying they were actually right and he has always longed to go to united... But he is going to city? Defies all logic.

He can wait 12 months and sign on up there for nothing if he was that way inclined.

He wants city, has done for months, it will get done.
 
Lets just hope the club and player set the record straight when he's signed and show the media up as a lying bunch of twats.

Players join City for the trophys and the money,theres no shame in that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.