Nathan Ake

40m transfer fee and 8m in wages so 50m isn't a great deal, unless it allows us to fund other deals, which I still don't understand why we need the funds given we were minted last pre season.
 
40m transfer fee and 8m in wages so 50m isn't a great deal, unless it allows us to fund other deals, which I still don't understand why we need the funds given we were minted last pre season.
I don’t think we do, just think we won’t move for a replacement centre back unless we are sure he’s going. Maybe we think he might not be going.
 
Cannot see the point in letting him go. He was looking really useful in the second half of last season. Unless we can get a better player for an equivalent fee then it does not seem a good deal.
 
Cannot see the point in letting him go. He was looking really useful in the second half of last season. Unless we can get a better player for an equivalent fee then it does not seem a good deal.
Selling him for £10mil (or more) than what he's worth
4th choice CB
Injury prone
7 weeks to get a replacement

That's why we're letting him go
 
Cannot see the point in letting him go. He was looking really useful in the second half of last season. Unless we can get a better player for an equivalent fee then it does not seem a good deal.
Good argument to show whoever replaces him for the “lack of gametime”. Ake played one more game than Stones last season :) I think it’ll be Pau.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.