New chants

[jimharri]

It's no laughing matter. The poor bloke could well have ended up dead. Let's have some respect, blues.

Take it you winding us up or have had to much Guinesss

No; I'm deadly serious. The guy could have been killed on the pitch.

Spoiler

 

[cleavers]

for the record, it wouldn't have killed anyone. The ball was too close to him and therefore traveling slow. Wouldve done more damage hit from distance as the speed would have built up to 70 plus mph, from short distance no real speed would have built up.

I guess you neither a physicist, nor a mathematician, because after being struck the ball would only get slower. Its the strike of the ball that accelerates it, and immediately friction with the air starts to slow it down.

 

[Ed2607]

for the record, it wouldn't have killed anyone. The ball was too close to him and therefore traveling slow. Wouldve done more damage hit from distance as the speed would have built up to 70 plus mph, from short distance no real speed would have built up.

I guess you neither a physicist, nor a mathematician, because after being struck the ball would only get slower. Its the strike of the ball that accelerates it, and immediately friction with the air starts to slow it down.

Wrong. Your ignoring the very force which thrusts an object to its target, acceleration.

Secondly, I'm afraid to disappoint you on your guess but my knowledge on the subject is not derived from guesswork or conjecture. Perhaps my explanation in the last post wasn't clear so Ill try and clarify if it makes you happier.

Simply put, it takes an object time to build up acceleration, in this case the ball. From leaving the boot the ball will not accelerate to 70 mph immediately no matter how hard it's hit. (Eg: A car will not go from 0 to 60 in 0 seconds no matter how powerful the engine) this has to do with inertia, motion and Mr Newtons gravity and the forces of physics.

Regardless of this, the ball is full of air, it will not kill someone otherwise we might have a few more people ducking out of walls because by the time the ball travels 10 yards the force, speed and power of the ball is far greater than one travelling over a few feet which means impact would be far greater over the objects prime distance. (The distance where it achieves maximum velocity before, as you point out, starting to reduce in speed)

Bacon face was wrong to say what he said and you can defend it all you want but fact is better than fiction in most instances.

 

[cleavers]

Wrong. Your ignoring the very force which thrusts an object to its target, acceleration.

I'm not, the force involved is the kicking of the ball, that is the total acceleration, from at the most a few milliseconds after the ball is kicked its slowing down.

 

[Lavinda Past]

What was the.....you're just a shit...was it Gordon Ramsey? You're just a shit Gordon Ramsey?

That was the six-fingered mother f*cking shitkickers singing 'you're just a shit john ruddy' to Joe Hart.

They have no class.

We outsang them all afternoon. They are shitkickers.

 

[js1993]

What are the words to the Nastasic song ? Sang on the concourse pre kick off

 

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

for the record, it wouldn't have killed anyone. The ball was too close to him and therefore traveling slow. Wouldve done more damage hit from distance as the speed would have built up to 70 plus mph, from short distance no real speed would have built up.

I guess you neither a physicist, nor a mathematician, because after being struck the ball would only get slower. Its the strike of the ball that accelerates it, and immediately friction with the air starts to slow it down.

Wrong. Your ignoring the very force which thrusts an object to its target, acceleration.

Secondly, I'm afraid to disappoint you on your guess but my knowledge on the subject is not derived from guesswork or conjecture. Perhaps my explanation in the last post wasn't clear so Ill try and clarify if it makes you happier.

Simply put, it takes an object time to build up acceleration, in this case the ball. From leaving the boot the ball will not accelerate to 70 mph immediately no matter how hard it's hit. (Eg: A car will not go from 0 to 60 in 0 seconds no matter how powerful the engine) this has to do with inertia, motion and Mr Newtons gravity and the forces of physics.

Regardless of this, the ball is full of air, it will not kill someone otherwise we might have a few more people ducking out of walls because by the time the ball travels 10 yards the force, speed and power of the ball is far greater than one travelling over a few feet which means impact would be far greater over the objects prime distance. (The distance where it achieves maximum velocity before, as you point out, starting to reduce in speed)

Bacon face was wrong to say what he said and you can defend it all you want but fact is better than fiction in most instances.

You're an American, aren't you?

 

[117 M34]

Wrong. Your ignoring the very force which thrusts an object to its target, acceleration.

I'm not, the force involved is the kicking of the ball, that is the total acceleration, from at the most a few milliseconds after the ball is kicked its slowing down.

I'm with ed on this one, it would speed up to it's maximum speed then slow down afterwards.

I think the word 'velocity' should be in the explanation somewhere too but I might be getting mixed up with that.

 

[Oystercatcher28]

MCCF, KO.

 

[ManCitizens.]

for the record, it wouldn't have killed anyone. The ball was too close to him and therefore traveling slow. Wouldve done more damage hit from distance as the speed would have built up to 70 plus mph, from short distance no real speed would have built up.

I guess you neither a physicist, nor a mathematician, because after being struck the ball would only get slower. Its the strike of the ball that accelerates it, and immediately friction with the air starts to slow it down.

Wrong. Your ignoring the very force which thrusts an object to its target, acceleration.

Secondly, I'm afraid to disappoint you on your guess but my knowledge on the subject is not derived from guesswork or conjecture. Perhaps my explanation in the last post wasn't clear so Ill try and clarify if it makes you happier.

Simply put, it takes an object time to build up acceleration, in this case the ball. From leaving the boot the ball will not accelerate to 70 mph immediately no matter how hard it's hit. (Eg: A car will not go from 0 to 60 in 0 seconds no matter how powerful the engine) this has to do with inertia, motion and Mr Newtons gravity and the forces of physics.

Regardless of this, the ball is full of air, it will not kill someone otherwise we might have a few more people ducking out of walls because by the time the ball travels 10 yards the force, speed and power of the ball is far greater than one travelling over a few feet which means impact would be far greater over the objects prime distance. (The distance where it achieves maximum velocity before, as you point out, starting to reduce in speed)

Bacon face was wrong to say what he said and you can defend it all you want but fact is better than fiction in most instances.

So he could have been dead?