blueish swede
Well-Known Member
I've always considered the Union Jack/Flag as the true flag flag as it not only signifies that we are English, but that we own other countries as well.
I've always considered the Union Jack/Flag as the true flag flag as it not only signifies that we are English, but that we own other countries as well.
If you want to do that, then I’m not going to stop you. It’s a football shirt design.In your opinion. How about I decide to put a black diagonal cross through the welsh flag , presumably you would would be fine with that aswell?? Theirs is no difference.
In the middle next to world cup willy.
Who in their right mind will pay £125 for a shirt anyway? That's the really obscene part we should be talking about.
Correct, so where do you draw the line and who does it?There's a massive difference unless you're completely unwell.
Plenty would tho!If you want to do that, then I’m not going to stop you. It’s a football shirt design.
The issue is not that the cross of St George is or isn’t a traditional element of the England kit, the issue is that it has been re coloured for no particular reason apart from a ‘playful update’. I don’t get it.The story has just been on Radio 4. A kit designer and Peter "Shitters" Shilton. As you'd expect, Shitters was going on about tradition and wokeness when the kit designer guy pointed out that the FoSG didn't appear on the kit until around 2000, so it's not like its a traditional element.
A confected dead squirrel story to keep the Mail, Express and GBeebies frothing so that people don't have to think about the grown-up stuff.
I’m not arguing. It’s a football shirt!Plenty would tho!
You know where this discussion is going? so you chose your argument wisely Alan.