HelloCity
Well-Known Member
The original was.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
New PL Commercial rule passed (pg4) | City rumoured to be questioning the legality
- Thread starter mancity dan
- Start date
The original was.
Man_City_Loyal
Well-Known Member
The original was.
ESL was originally suggested to work alongside the EPL season from what I remember.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 16,264
- Team supported
- Manchester City
This is a battle that the non American owned clubs have to win otherwise football is gone
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
Expect nothing less of the Red Shites, but the rest of the short sighted, cowardly lemmings going along with everything they want, is mind boggling.
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
Not a bad bargaining ploy this.I'm worried. Does this mean that half of the expensive team of lawyers have been moved off the 115 charges case, or have we found some more?
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 10,127
The ESL was never replacing domestic league structures. It was replacing UEFA competitions.
For about 12 months.
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
China Media Partners I think The Chinese government decided it wasnt good after to invest in football so they soldI thought there was a Chinese group in there too?
Last edited:
If the rule is for a two thirds majority to carry a vote, then that's that. It's what all the clubs must abide by until they pass a change to that rule for a 50% majority or whatever. Two thirds majority makes it harder to get these changes passed though.
Rule passed even though they weren't close to the 14 votes required. Abstainations shouldn't lower the threshold. What a joke this league is. Passes on 2/3rds rule.
12 is barely a majority and what happens if 3 of those go down this season?
We all know the American owned clubs will vote for anything that restricts their need to spend. That's a persuasive argument to neutral clubs, especially if they don't have wealthy business partners to call upon for sponsorships.
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
Tell that to the clubs that voted for FFP / FSR and are now regretting itAm I missing something this has been voted through surely it is in the interests of ALL clubs to oppose this..as it can effect all clubs..