Not to mention the scum’s contract to advise the Saudi FA.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
New PL Commercial rule passed (pg4) | City rumoured to be questioning the legality
- Thread starter mancity dan
- Start date
How to infuriate the redshirt’s owners.
1. Be owned by brown skinned Muslims.
2. Be owned by super rich people who will never need to sell out to Americans.
3. Become the most watched premier league team in US.
4. Become, probably, the most popular non Spanish side in S. America.
5. Win all the trophies that the Redshirts thought they were entitled to.
6. Just fuck ‘em again and again and again.
Tee Hee!
Isn‘t it great to be a blue.
1. Be owned by brown skinned Muslims.
2. Be owned by super rich people who will never need to sell out to Americans.
3. Become the most watched premier league team in US.
4. Become, probably, the most popular non Spanish side in S. America.
5. Win all the trophies that the Redshirts thought they were entitled to.
6. Just fuck ‘em again and again and again.
Tee Hee!
Isn‘t it great to be a blue.
jaiguruKun
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 5,510
The new rules state if your name ends in y, you are not allowed to have sponsors from the same country as your owners.
Kamaro011
Well-Known Member
anyone not familiar and also an expert on detailed legal jargon or accounting rules/laws is not even a real City fan.
I think its time for Mansour to go to directly to Apple, Amazon etc and ask them for a sponsorship deal never seen before.
imagine the sheer shock in sport media, rival fans if Apple would come in and pay to be shirt sponsor for 3x what Etihad paying us.
wonder what rules would be brought in not to allow it.
Amazon Prime on our shirt sponsor will be amazing to see.
Random Precision
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Aug 2023
- Messages
- 61
- Team supported
- Newcastle
After Newcastle were taken over and the PL Clubs, City abstained, voted to bring in FMV, they told the meeting what they were doing was illegal. You may well be correct with your assumption and I as a Newcastle fan hope it is. These cartel clubs need taken down.Would have thought it was Newcastle with the legal challenge. but whoever well done, can you believe it the PL adopting yet another illegal rule, what governing body repeatedly take up illegal practices and stay in power.
Oh FFS. Why can't they just let us plaster our owners' airline over our 4 kits and 3 specials, name our new hotel the Mubadala Lodge, rent the top 2 floors of our Arabtec-bulit stadium office block to the Central Bank of UAE, and pay our managers in dirhams! Always with these fucking roadblocks.
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
Is this happening because Etihad are posting record profits so can justify paying more money than they already are for stadium and shirt sponsorship?
Wonder what new sponsors the rags are talking with that don’t want to pay the over inflated numbers Team Viewer were paying and decided to exit the agreement.
Wonder what new sponsors the rags are talking with that don’t want to pay the over inflated numbers Team Viewer were paying and decided to exit the agreement.
Every chance we are one of them.You need ask?
So, which 2 idiot clubs abstained? Any clues about?
II think Etihad should sponsor Newcastle and their stadium for 75m a year and Saudi airlines should have a similar deal with City, the piss boiling would be hilarious.
Ther would still be seen as related. Falayfel, Falafel.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 9,213
Is this happening because Etihad are posting record profits so can justify paying more money than they already are for stadium and shirt sponsorship?
Wonder what new sponsors the rags are talking with that don’t want to pay the over inflated numbers Team Viewer were paying and decided to exit the agreement.
I’m sure I saw the plan was to double growth by 2030…. What a sham