Unless I’m not understanding,likely, it makes no sense. If clubs that can least afford it can spend over their income and the same as us, how is that stopping them going into massive debt?
Or have I misunderstood?
We don’t know the details in full but as ‘halfcenturyup’ says, there is clearly more in the details.My question again, then is what is to stop Brentford borrowing 350 million (actually more because of capitalisation, but let's keep it simple), making a 350 million loss and going bankrupt the same year? There must be more to it than this ......
I’d be gobsmacked if it isn’t ultimately a bolt-on to FFP/PSR rules, essentially keeping the top clubs within sight on the horizon while the smaller clubs try to grow.