New PL financial controls | Clubs agree squad spending cap 'in principle'

Don't you think with our club voting against it tells you it not right?

Do you think the club was right to increase season ticket prices every year?

If not, then you are, like me, living in a world where not everything the board of MCFC does is right purely because they do it.

So why would you assume the rules must be wrong because City voted against them?

Form your own opinion on something, don’t just blindly assume half a dozen people you’ve probably never met are making the right choices by default because they’re wearing City lapel pin.
 
Shit idea. Needs fucking off before it begins.

Not out fault if Sheffield Utd and Burnley are shit, or Chelsea poorly run. You reap what you so, they need to man up and deal with it, fucking whinging set of cunts.

We need to go out and spend £500m on young star players in summer before all these shit arbitrary rules can come into force.

Yep

smaller clubs equals fewer fans turn up to watch them, It is not the bigger clubs' fault that they have a bigger fan base because they are from a bigger City or Town,

Why not Ban fans from other countries and towns or cities watching United or Liverpool in stead of their local teams
 
What many don't recognise in the PL is that from the 16 years going from 92 to 08 when we were bought out, there was 4 different league winners, since our buyout there have been 5 different winners in the 16 years since 08, there could be 6 if Arsenal win it.

There is nothing wrong with the competitiveness in the PL. We are on dynasty mode at the moment like United was in the 90s, but it won't last forever. I am pretty sure when Pep leaves there will be a slump.

Why all of a sudden are all these laws being put in place because fans of other leagues think there is not competition anymore?
Crystal Carrington likes this.
 
Do you think the club was right to increase season ticket prices every year?

If not, then you are, like me, living in a world where not everything the board of MCFC does is right purely because they do it.

So why would you assume the rules must be wrong because City voted against them?

Form your own opinion on something, don’t just blindly assume half a dozen people you’ve probably never met are making the right choices by default.
That's sophism. The club acted in what it considered to be its best interests in both cases. You can agree or disagree with either decision.
 
So, we will have Wirtz on loan from Melbourne City paying half his wages…

It seems a sound idea idealistically. As we’ve shown, we’re the best because we spend our money better than everyone else.

If this continues, then no scheme will harm us much. Everybody’s cloth will be cut similarly.
 
That's sophism. The club acted in what it considered to be its best interests in both cases. You can agree or disagree with either decision.

Yes, but what you can’t do is say “the club says this is right so it’s right” and then disagree with half the clubs decisions.

If your only reasoning for the club being right is the club is always right, which is waspishs position, then you have to agree with every decision.
 
Survival of the fittest replaced by survival for all, i fail to see how this helps english football progress if anything i see it as more stagnating measure.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.