citymad said:Neville Kneville said:chedinho said:Yankee Stadium was largely filled with fans wearing Chelsea gear, but that may have been because the Londoners have been GIVING away stuff outside the stadiums![/quote
is that true.
i was surprised at the amount of fans they had at the games.
I was surprised at how many shirts but there seemed to be at least as much noise when City scored as Chelsea, possibly more. Also lots of the Chelsea 'fans' seemed to be jumping around when City scored.
Bit fishy if you ask me.
Wouldn't surprise me if they got the teams mixed up or just shouted for ant team that scored. I reckon both teams were told don't worry about defending just go out and put on a show and make sure there's at least 4-5 goals.
citymad said:Neville Kneville said:chedinho said:Yankee Stadium was largely filled with fans wearing Chelsea gear, but that may have been because the Londoners have been GIVING away stuff outside the stadiums![/quote
is that true.
i was surprised at the amount of fans they had at the games.
I was surprised at how many shirts but there seemed to be at least as much noise when City scored as Chelsea, possibly more. Also lots of the Chelsea 'fans' seemed to be jumping around when City scored.
Bit fishy if you ask me.
Wouldn't surprise me if they got the teams mixed up or just shouted for ant team that scored. I reckon both teams were told don't worry about defending just go out and put on a show and make sure there's at least 4-5 goals.
Falastur said:citymad said:Neville Kneville said:I was surprised at how many shirts but there seemed to be at least as much noise when City scored as Chelsea, possibly more. Also lots of the Chelsea 'fans' seemed to be jumping around when City scored.
Bit fishy if you ask me.
Wouldn't surprise me if they got the teams mixed up or just shouted for ant team that scored. I reckon both teams were told don't worry about defending just go out and put on a show and make sure there's at least 4-5 goals.
They were definitely told to keep defending - I remember one moment yesterday where Mata was cutting in from the side to shoot, and two players - I think Lescott and...Nasri? - both desperately threw themselves into a slide to try to deflect his shot with their legs. You don't do that if you're not trying to defend.
More rather, they were both told that it was more important to be stylish - hence the constant attempts to pass straight through the centre of Chelsea's defence with no wing work at all - and that performance was more important than result.
Falastur said:citymad said:Neville Kneville said:I was surprised at how many shirts but there seemed to be at least as much noise when City scored as Chelsea, possibly more. Also lots of the Chelsea 'fans' seemed to be jumping around when City scored.
Bit fishy if you ask me.
Wouldn't surprise me if they got the teams mixed up or just shouted for ant team that scored. I reckon both teams were told don't worry about defending just go out and put on a show and make sure there's at least 4-5 goals.
They were definitely told to keep defending - I remember one moment yesterday where Mata was cutting in from the side to shoot, and two players - I think Lescott and...Nasri? - both desperately threw themselves into a slide to try to deflect his shot with their legs. You don't do that if you're not trying to defend.
More rather, they were both told that it was more important to be stylish - hence the constant attempts to pass straight through the centre of Chelsea's defence with no wing work at all - and that performance was more important than result.
Barcon said:Falastur said:citymad said:Wouldn't surprise me if they got the teams mixed up or just shouted for ant team that scored. I reckon both teams were told don't worry about defending just go out and put on a show and make sure there's at least 4-5 goals.
They were definitely told to keep defending - I remember one moment yesterday where Mata was cutting in from the side to shoot, and two players - I think Lescott and...Nasri? - both desperately threw themselves into a slide to try to deflect his shot with their legs. You don't do that if you're not trying to defend.
More rather, they were both told that it was more important to be stylish - hence the constant attempts to pass straight through the centre of Chelsea's defence with no wing work at all - and that performance was more important than result.
It looked to me like chelsea were doing there best impession of Bolton circa fat sam era. Goalie passes ball to sideshow, sideshow lobs ball to Ba, who tries to stay onside. You could also change the names to evra and rooney.
Mike N said:Bunk said:Section 135! Right behind the goal in the City end.
I'll be in the Hatter beforehand.
This will be the first time I have seen City play since 5th May 1996 at Maine Road!!!
Jesus, that was some game to finish on!
Hope you enjoyed the game.
I don't know.Vienna_70 said:We watched the match on Chelsea TV last night and the thing that struck us was that the commentary was much more even-handed than Sky, BBC or ITV are for our games!