New Zealand terrorist attack

[SWP's back]

Balance??

What a hypocrite!!

In the now defunct 'UK Citizenship' thread, where was the 'balance' when you were allowing posters to happily slag off a dead baby yet singled me out for calling that behaviour out?? You're as biased as they come!

You're calling for 'balance' is utter nonsense.

I’d tell you where the balance was (in terms of retort to what you mention above) in that thread but it would probably also get this thread pulled. (And rightly so, one user should have been perma-banned).

Rather than a pissing contest to see who could be more outraged at each other on bluemoon, why not just actually carry on the debate you rightly want, rather than continue an attack on FI. There’s been over 40 pages on this thread and a handful of posts such as FI’s and plenty have already disagreed with him - especially me.

FI is very much in the minority on his view of not wanting the terrorist’s politics to be discussed, ric’s overruled him so discuss away, although you have had some fascination that it took four pages for the atrocity to be labelled as terrorism on Bluemoon as if it matters a damn in the grand scheme of things. No one is calling it anything but that now everyone is educated on what actually happened. I dare say that during the first four pages, BM was the first source of what had actually happened, don’t lose sleep over it. Focus on the cûnt, his politics and how extremist right wing views being normalised is a scary thing to add to the 21st century cooking pot. They’re the real issues.

 

[nmc]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-47597710 For god sake what is wrong with people.

 

[blueinsa]

I’d tell you where the balance was (in terms of retort to what you mention above) in that thread but it would probably also get this thread pulled. (And rightly so, one user should have been perma-banned).

Spot on!

 

[Bigga]

I’d tell you where the balance was (in terms of retort to what you mention above) in that thread but it would probably also get this thread pulled. (And rightly so, one user should have been perma-banned).

Rather than a pissing contest to see who could be more outraged, why not just actually carry on the debate you rightly want, rather than continue an attack on FI. There’s been over 40 pages on this thread and a handful of posts such as FI’s and plenty have already disagreed with him - especially me.

FI is very much in the minority on his view of not wanting the terrorist’s politics to be discussed, ric’s overruled him so discuss away, although you have had some fascination that it took four pages for the atrocity to be labelled as terrorism on Bluemoon as if it matters a damn in the grand scheme of things. No one is calling it anything but that now everyone is educated on what actually happened. I dare say that during the first four pages, BM was the first source of what had actually happened, don’t lose sleep over it. Focus on the cûnt, his politics and how extremist right wing views being normalised is a scary thing to add to the 21st century cooking pot. They’re the real issues.

I'm not talking about the other thread.

It was mentioned in context about a person trying to claim they're arguing for balance when they judge before they learn, every time.

But, yes, I agree with the overall sentiment of your post.

 

[RichardDunneOwnGoal]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-47597710 For god sake what is wrong with people.

Some people are just wrong uns

 

[Armchair Supporter]

it took four pages for the atrocity to be labelled as terrorism on Bluemoon as if it matters a damn in the grand scheme of things. No one is calling it anything but that now everyone is educated on what actually happened.

Its good to talk.

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

I know alot of you have, but i can't wrap my head around how anyone could or why they would watch that video.

I'm terrified my 13 and 11 year old daughters get to see this! How easy is it for kids to access this footage?

I have a 16 year old who is never off YouTube. I’ve warned him. Got the usual yeah yeah at first.
But I explained that I wasn’t having a go at him and said this could arrive on his phone unsolicited. If it happens get rid of it.
He said he’d have no interest or desire to see such a thing.

Nothing I can do to stop the possibility of him watching it but I felt I had to discuss it with him.

 

[bluethrunthru]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-47597710 For god sake what is wrong with people.

Just read BM you'll see

 

[bluethrunthru]

I have a 16 year old who is never off YouTube. I’ve warned him. Got the usual yeah yeah at first.
But I explained that I wasn’t having a go at him and said this could arrive on his phone unsolicited. If it happens get rid of it.
He said he’d have no interest or desire to see such a thing.

Nothing I can do to stop the possibility of him watching it but I felt I had to discuss it with him.

good on you. you cannot stop him seeing it but at least you have made him aware of what that content represents.

 

[FantasyIreland]

FI is very much in the minority on his view of not wanting the terrorist’s politics to be discussed

That wasn't my intention at all,as i have attempted to explain on numerous occasions subsequently.The members who decided to twist my sentiments to suit their own agenda are of no surprise either.