Newcastle United Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ric said:
Not really sure why we'd get involved at this stage?
Click to expand...


Maybe if it comes in they will look at our sponsor and make them fair value where as now we have none, or it’s this panel looking at all sponsor and they decide what is fair value! How can American owners who have “mates” who ramp up there sponsors but never get looked at where as if this comes in every sponsor from where our owner comes from will be looked at!

It be like because the likes of the rags scousers are looked on as mega clubs they be no scrutinising! Oh big car company here’s 100m a year no problem but a big company in our owners country oh no no you can’t have a 50m a year sponsor has to be half that!

This comes in and then who assess fair value which we know It be influenced by the history clubs.
 
This is more of a problem for Newcastle. Big difference between a team who have won the PL 3 times in the past 5 years, play football that is eye candy and have been an ever present in the Champions League for a decade, and a team who have done nothing for decades. The bar codes will be reliant on sponsorship from 'related' parties to achieve stability never mind success. City have come a long way since that situation and we are now amongst the big boys when it comes to sponsorship. Our potentially 'related' sponsorship probably remains partially out of loyalty by the club to those companies who supported us in the early days. Today if a company wants to throw silly money at a club to sponsor anything and they can choose between us and the dippers, rags, chavs etc the only reason they would go to them is the Asian market but historically that has not been mega sponsorship deals. If you want your companies name associated with a successful team who get results by football that is entertaining rather than defense based at present there is no better deal than City
 
Ric said:
Not really sure why we'd get involved at this stage?
Click to expand...

Pure speculation. Given City's non litigious stance, can't see us getting involved. The writer will be under the impression that we have a high proportion of connected sponsorship; he's a journo, you see, so no need to check his facts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.