Alex B
Well-Known Member
Nreddishblue said:
Fucking hell, thats shocking.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nick Griffin on Question Time..
- Thread starter ono
- Start date
Fucking hell, thats shocking.
lafitz2008
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 1,269
brooklandsblue2.0 said:I think he'll come across very well against some clapping morons in the audience applauding every attack thrown at him.
He probably will come across well,I've not seen much of him as a speaker but I can imagine he's very comfortable with confrontation and unfortunately history's full of morally dubious people who have been charismatic orators.
der-bomber
Well-Known Member
kiam06 said:tommyducks said:Probably take it with his burning cross and white hood, and hang the nearest black person.
Lets hope not.
Health and Safety would never allow it, a naked flame could never be permitted in a Television studio ...
Also, it would be a logistical nightmare to construct a gallows inside a building, and anyone foolish enough to wear a hood indoors would end up sweating like a scouser in a spelling contest...
TheMightyQuinn
Well-Known Member
tommyducks said:More bigoted eejits waving the flag of Christianity. Yes, Jesus would have loved your attitude to your fellow man.
This would be the Christian White Jesus though, you know, the white guy with long black hair and a neat beard, the only white guy to be born in Bethlehem on 25/12/0000
der-bomber
Well-Known Member
tommyducks said:Turd in letterbox time!levets said:Not sure I'm happy with that being posted on here... names, addresses, phone numbers..
even though it's in the public domain, is it there legally?
Maybe we could merge this with the posties' thread and get them to do it....?
See how my unparallelled business acumen came into play there...
How come that useless cnut Crozier draws a seven figure salary and he never thought of it...
Didsbury Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2007
- Messages
- 38,068
Can't be arsed to read the thread but I'm looking forward to seeing this.
I hate what he says but he has a right to say it.
I just hope he isn't spoonfed a load of simple questions he can bat away with tripe oratory that the plebs will agree with.
We need to get him off "this country needs it's identity back" and "immigration is out of control" which he can do in his sleep, and get him on questions about his party's core beliefs, their past, their take on the holocost, homosexuality etc.
I think he'll get mullered. He might be bright but his party is full of shite.
I hate what he says but he has a right to say it.
I just hope he isn't spoonfed a load of simple questions he can bat away with tripe oratory that the plebs will agree with.
We need to get him off "this country needs it's identity back" and "immigration is out of control" which he can do in his sleep, and get him on questions about his party's core beliefs, their past, their take on the holocost, homosexuality etc.
I think he'll get mullered. He might be bright but his party is full of shite.
TheMightyQuinn
Well-Known Member
Didsbury Dave said:Can't be arsed to read the thread but I'm looking forward to seeing this.
I hate what he says but he has a right to say it.
I just hope he isn't spoonfed a load of simple questions he can bat away with tripe oratory that the plebs will agree with.
We need to get him off "this country needs it's identity back" and "immigration is out of control" which he can do in his sleep, and get him on questions about his party's core beliefs, their past, their take on the holocost, homosexuality etc.
I think he'll get mullered. He might be bright but his party is full of shite.
The Holocaust didn't happen, rape is sex and, by it's very nature, sex is good so rape is also good. People who are not white CAN join the party, they've just suspended any new members until they've found a way to stop them - He hasn't the balls to admit to his own policies, how anyone can vote for this man on the strength of his spoken 'policies' is beyond me.
He isn't bright, if he was bright no one would know he was a holocaust denier and an advocate of rape, no intelligent man would speak such rubbish as he'd be aware, being intelligent, that he was talking shite.
Was just talking about this with my mate the other day. I'm dead against it. On the simple fact that by the end of the programme tonight there will be vast more numbers of BNP supporters than at the start of the programme.
When Jean Marie Le Pen on the French National Front went on a similar programme in France in the mid-1980s, their popularity more than doubled overnight. Not because their arguments were superior, just simply because they were exposed to a mass audience which they have never been able to reach. If this guy throws enough shit, some if it weill stick.
People, the OP for example being one, think that by being made to look foolish on tv will dissuade people from supporting the party. But where is the evidence for that? He's been made to look an idiot time and time again on tv and it hasn't stopped them. It's not as if BNP voters make their choice by rational and reasoned debate.
The panel they've chosen is pretty poor. Stephen Fry, Charlie Brooker, Jon Cruddas would have been great. Or someone like Bob Crow from the RMT.
The BBC keep saying it was inevitable that they'd invite them on, but there was no inevitability about it at all. A team of two, maybe three producers and editors made this decision consciously. And i think it is a poor decision. The BNP are now literally laughing at what they call 'their stupid decision'.
Who knows? I think there's a good chance it could just end up as a big scrap in the audience to be honest.
I've met a lot of BNP supporters and voters campaigning in Liverpool and Manchester... they are a fucking vile lot and they should not be legitimised.
It's also worth noting that Nick Griffin has a pretty decent intelect of his own, Cambridge education and all that
When Jean Marie Le Pen on the French National Front went on a similar programme in France in the mid-1980s, their popularity more than doubled overnight. Not because their arguments were superior, just simply because they were exposed to a mass audience which they have never been able to reach. If this guy throws enough shit, some if it weill stick.
People, the OP for example being one, think that by being made to look foolish on tv will dissuade people from supporting the party. But where is the evidence for that? He's been made to look an idiot time and time again on tv and it hasn't stopped them. It's not as if BNP voters make their choice by rational and reasoned debate.
The panel they've chosen is pretty poor. Stephen Fry, Charlie Brooker, Jon Cruddas would have been great. Or someone like Bob Crow from the RMT.
The BBC keep saying it was inevitable that they'd invite them on, but there was no inevitability about it at all. A team of two, maybe three producers and editors made this decision consciously. And i think it is a poor decision. The BNP are now literally laughing at what they call 'their stupid decision'.
Who knows? I think there's a good chance it could just end up as a big scrap in the audience to be honest.
I've met a lot of BNP supporters and voters campaigning in Liverpool and Manchester... they are a fucking vile lot and they should not be legitimised.
It's also worth noting that Nick Griffin has a pretty decent intelect of his own, Cambridge education and all that
Unknown_Genius
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 5,840
lafitz2008 said:brooklandsblue2.0 said:I think he'll come across very well against some clapping morons in the audience applauding every attack thrown at him.
He probably will come across well,I've not seen much of him as a speaker but I can imagine he's very comfortable with confrontation and unfortunately history's full of morally dubious people who have been charismatic orators.
Hitler was a great speaker.
I'm not going to watch it. Hopefully the whole debate won't all be about immigration, and so on, but more about the BNP's other policies, which aren't as highly documented as their stance on immigration and British identity.
TheMightyQuinn
Well-Known Member
Most BNP supporters only do it for the 'oooh look at me being controversial' factor, it's as naff as owning a 2Pac CD or tucking your shell suit into your socks. It's the new pitbull terrier. In other words, it's nobhead 'chic'