Don’t think wages should make that much of a difference We tend to pay very incentive based and don’t Liverpool pay similar to us these days but maybe Otamendi and Lovern are not comparable as Otamendi was at one point more important to us than Lovern was to Liverpool
Incentives for a team that probably meets most of them over the life time of a contract becomes the default. We’ve done that pretty well for the time he’s been here. Despite his hugely erratic performances of late, he’s helped us to achieve many of those ‘incentives’.
He’ll have a book value based on his original cost and current amortisation level. We’ll be looking for anything equal or above that to show a positive on the balance sheet. The wages pay off will likely come into that equation.
Given we tend to always look after players that have served us well, including not slagging us off in the media (and in the long term this won’t go unnoticed with other players and particularly agents) I’m sure we’ll let him go on favourable terms whilst ticking our own boxes.
If he goes he’s been an incredibly frustrating player but on the whole good. He’s got it all for most of a match but then just defaults to brain dead mode. However I think he also declined physically last season and in this league, with the way we play, it’s not ideal. It’s the right time.
In the end, I feel he’ll end up a bit like Kolarov for me. You’ll remember his best bits, he didn’t slag us off, he’ll do well in a lesser league and in time he’ll be appreciated beyond the level he was actually at.