Didsbury Dave said:
BringBackSwales said:
Hung said:
I can’t see that anyone can argue with any of that, regardless of how many eyes you’ve got.
oh but dismal didsbury can (and indeed has)
yeah mate. Some semi-literate geezer on the Internet knows it all. Its impossible to argue with your flawless logic. In fact If the head of BBC Radio's sports team is out there he'll be appointing you to the board of directors after that insightful diatribe. Hell, If he hears you don't like Fred Eyre(the Fred eyre who's made himself very rich writing and performing on the after dinner circuit about football) he might set a focus group around you or something. He may be concerned you don't seem hugely impressed with wagg, though. What's the problem? Had he mentioned united a few too many times? There was a thread on here once calling him
Jimmy Rag for that you know. You could perhaps use that as a basis for a thesis you write for him.
In fact why not recommend the BBC acoher City team so they can up their game and appeal to the sensible posters on this thread? They could go for Les Battersby, Daft Donald and Liam Gallagher. None of this pro-rag agenda stuff from those boys, eh?
We're onto something here.
I think there's only 1 geezer on the internet that knows it all and it most certainly isn't me. However rather than your continued vague meanderings about things I haven't actually said, how about answering the points actually raised:-
do you REALLY think nigel gleghorn is coherent and eloquent?
do you think he is tactically astute? Go on, as you seem to know everything (plus some), give me 1 example of nigel's tactical prowess from comments he made after Sunday's match?
tell me that you REALLY think he is a good communicator and hosts a good show, links between calls well, communicates clearly and articulately?
Give me an example of how well you think he relates to callers, how he skillfully initiates intelligent discussion with those callers, how he develops interesting and stimulating debate?
Tell me, and mean it, that he does not have an intense dislike of Roberto Mancini and bring it into EVERY show he is involved with - go on, tell me the last time he did a show on radio manchester and did not have a pop at Mancini, give me an approximate date?
Give me an example of his humour, just one would be good
But you never do, you do not respond to the specific points raised, you make up vague, irrelevant and frankly inaccurate points - when did I mention Liam Gallagher, Daft Donald or Les Battersby? When did I say anything about the BBC board ofdirectors (and would that be the same BBC who have employed such luminaries as david mellor, alan green, steve claridge, danny mills, alan hansen, mark lawrenson, alan shearer and edwina currie? - so yes of course the BBC ALWAYS gets it right, this obviosuly proves that the appointment of nigel gleghorn into his role was the usual bbc managerial masterstroke.
But why not let what I actually said get in the way of what you would like to portray that I said. And then why not for good measure throw in a bit of your usual arrogant, smarmy put downs such as "semi literate"? Yeah, nice one that dave
Your smugness shines through your posts it really does. I have genuine reasons for feeling that nigel gleghorn is extremely poor at what he does, a view shared by many but not all, but one which I am more than capable of expressing, and also completely entitled to, semi-literate as I may (or indeed may not) be - it beats a snearing attitude, and made-up irrelevant drivel
