Would a FOI request work to find out who was on the label and how they reached the decision? Yet another example of how corrupt the game is and how people benefit from giving the right decisions. One day it will all come out in the wash
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
No action against Lukaku
- Thread starter barryo
- Start date
Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 5,913
Gallagher is a well known rag fan.i try to give the rags a fair crack, but what your saying is nonsense
prestonibbo_mcfc
Well-Known Member
Who cares?
If we lift the trophy I don’t give a shit who says or writes what about us or them. I don’t anyway to be honest.
The press, radio and Tv stations, ex players, pundits, managers, fanboys... none of them matter in the grand scheme of things.
Those who have any ounce of anything about them knows what’s what with us and them and that’s all that matters
Not in this case, these are the fuckers that usually lead the witch hunt. So they can matter in the grand scheme of things.
prestonibbo_mcfc
Well-Known Member
What's to say? I'm not defending Lukaku, he was stupid and I said yesterday that I wouldn't argue if he was banned.
However I think Gallagher breaks it down well and Goater also said that when you feel mishandled on set pieces from markers the inclination is to get them off you. I also think the non-reaction of Bong or any other Brighton player is telling in this case.
Yes. What it tells you is, that they are more fucking professional than Lukaku can ever wish to be.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
Would a FOI request work to find out who was on the label and how they reached the decision? Yet another example of how corrupt the game is and how people benefit from giving the right decisions. One day it will all come out in the wash
No.
I don't want the panellists revealed due to the neanderthal balaclava mob who follow football.
Reaching a decision falls down to opinion, and clearly at least one does not view it as a red card offence. That's fine, as the alternative is not really having a panel at all.
I`ll let you explain to Shaun that he knows fuck all.
Just because we all love him, doesn't make him an expert on foul play!
He doesn`t know the law means he knows nothing of the subject matter,stop trying to wriggle out of it.
Wtf... he's wrong in this instance simple. As the vast majority of people on this thread agree with. Go look at the law and let me know where it states petulance is ok... And even if Shaun had kicked out and got away with it in the past, this doesn't mean it's all ok....
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Ah the vast majority of Blues fans who hate who ? Shaun never said it was OK either.As he stated it was frustration.Wtf... he's wrong in this instance simple. As the vast majority of people on this thread agree with. Go look at the law and let me know where it states petulance is ok... And even if Shaun had kicked out and got away with it in the past, this doesn't mean it's all ok....
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
But is petulance foul play ?Just because we all love him, doesn't make him an expert on foul play!