SWP's back said:
danburge82 said:
Stonewall was the key word I thought. Those at Norwich could have gone either way when the refs have one view at ine angke at one speed, and they did.
Yes I agree about Richards, that was a definite pen no matter how you look at it.
But is that it? Two in two years?
No but people don't note every decision down on a pukka pad do they.
The Norwich ones were stonewall also.
Either way it doesn't explain 15 in a row at home when generally play the same style home and away. I'd love to see if any other club have had such a run of penalties.
Exactly, clearly we need to document every 'none' decision. How about when tevez was pulled back against Fulham only a few weeks ago, dubious maybe, but in the context of the penalty awarded against us in the same game it was a stonewall.
If people care to look there were countless decisions documented on previous threads from last season.
The agenda denier pidge just throws a meaningless stat out there and then states he 'doesn't care' about the context or timings of when the penaties were awarded. This is synonomos of those people who just want to bury their head in the sand. They actually dont want to believe what is staring them in the face.
In this season alone we have had;
The crouch basketball goal
The penalty awarded that wasnt even in the box or a foul
Yesterday, the sending off of milner for denying a'clear' goalscoring opportunity
Three match changing decisions in three games - and so the bias continues......
