Stop talking sense, ManU obviously pay off the refs and if they didn't then they would be in non league football as thats how shit they are. I mean you never see dodgy ref descisions in EVERY single league match do you?.vallens said:
No Smoke Without Fire?
- Thread starter Johnsonontheleft
- Start date
Barcon
Well-Known Member
Sugarloaf said:Johnsonontheleft said:
Post subject: Re: Consistency?Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:25 am
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:35 pm
Posts: 55 Lordeffingham wrote:
There have been a few articles on here recently, in which I and others have given strong views at the despicable behaviour of that cnutish little upstart Rafael, and his disgusting conduct, and I've just found something very interesting and that could lead to the FA, once and for all proving whether or not it has a secret agenda and shows undoubted favouritism towards the scummy red bastards we all love so much, on here.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba</a> ... h-ban.html
Refusing to leave Old Trafford pitch is set to cost Mascherano a three-match ban
Javier Mascherano is facing a three-match ban for his sending off at Manchester United, with the FA set to charge him with improper misconduct.
The Argentinian international is likely to have his mandatory one-game suspension for getting two yellow cards extended because of his refusal to leave the field after referee Steve Bennett's decision.
Bennett is expected to hand in his official match report today and the FA are keen to make an example of Mascherano, who still believes he did nothing wrong.
He said: 'I do not know why I was sent off. I asked the referee what was happening. I did not swear, I was not aggressive and I did not confront him.
All I did was ask him what was happening, nothing else. When he showed the second yellow card and sent me off I could not believe it'.?
**********************************************************
Now as in Rafaels case, Mascherano did not shout 'you're a fucking wanker' or any of the other vile abuse that came from this arogant little pricks foreign tongue, directly at the referee, however none the less, he then subsequently found himself on the recieving end of a further two game ban, implimented by the FA.
I think it could well be an interesting comparison, as both were for almost exacly the same situation, both sent off for 2 yellows, and both being reluctant to say the least, to leave the field of play without dissent.
Lets see how this unfolds, hope the FA realise that dual standards cannot be seen to apply and that their integrity will be placed in further doubt if they do not take the appropriate action.
Jeez, I think it's time you found yourself a girlfriend. You're one step away from going through someones bins.
Post subject: Re: Consistency?Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2011 12:25 am
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:35 pm
Posts: 55 Lordeffingham wrote:
There have been a few articles on here recently, in which I and others have given strong views at the despicable behaviour of that cnutish little upstart Rafael, and his disgusting conduct, and I've just found something very interesting and that could lead to the FA, once and for all proving whether or not it has a secret agenda and shows undoubted favouritism towards the scummy red bastards we all love so much, on here.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba</a> ... h-ban.html
Refusing to leave Old Trafford pitch is set to cost Mascherano a three-match ban
Javier Mascherano is facing a three-match ban for his sending off at Manchester United, with the FA set to charge him with improper misconduct.
The Argentinian international is likely to have his mandatory one-game suspension for getting two yellow cards extended because of his refusal to leave the field after referee Steve Bennett's decision.
Bennett is expected to hand in his official match report today and the FA are keen to make an example of Mascherano, who still believes he did nothing wrong.
He said: 'I do not know why I was sent off. I asked the referee what was happening. I did not swear, I was not aggressive and I did not confront him.
All I did was ask him what was happening, nothing else. When he showed the second yellow card and sent me off I could not believe it'.?
**********************************************************
Now as in Rafaels case, Mascherano did not shout 'you're a fucking wanker' or any of the other vile abuse that came from this arogant little pricks foreign tongue, directly at the referee, however none the less, he then subsequently found himself on the recieving end of a further two game ban, implimented by the FA.
I think it could well be an interesting comparison, as both were for almost exacly the same situation, both sent off for 2 yellows, and both being reluctant to say the least, to leave the field of play without dissent.
Lets see how this unfolds, hope the FA realise that dual standards cannot be seen to apply and that their integrity will be placed in further doubt if they do not take the appropriate action.
Jeez, I think it's time you found yourself a girlfriend. You're one step away from going through someones bins.
At least you'r consistant.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
i dont personally think united are paying them off, but they are certainly biased in some way towards them. i know how this might sound to another fan around the country but somethings not right here. i think all season i have come back from a match maybe once or twice and thought "the ref was alright today" the rest have been abissmal. i generally think some refs dis-like certain teams.
sibierski express
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Jan 2011
- Messages
- 149
Come on lads stuff like this makes us look really bitter. Every club has decisions go their way in almost every game. We had it in the Blackpool game twice and a few other times this season. I follow La Liga and Seria A a lot and the best thing about the football here in the Premier League is that there is never any corruption.
wanderer72
Well-Known Member
You don't need a conspiracy for Utd to keep effectively buying off the refs.
Utd can hurt the refs, and they know it. It's actually quite enough. The refs have mortgages too, and rarely a backbone. Hence, all the required prerequisites are there.
Utd can hurt the refs, and they know it. It's actually quite enough. The refs have mortgages too, and rarely a backbone. Hence, all the required prerequisites are there.
sibierski express said:
This.
It's a joke that the referees are so corrupt they make blatant decisions. It just doesn't happen, and as has been pointed out, it makes us look more than a little bitter.
United won, accept it, and let's hope we beat Notts County on Sunday with a dodgy decision from the referee.
wanderer72
Well-Known Member
vallens said:
Yup. I'd love filling all the gaps in between so it makes a stronger argumentation (this is an outline) but I'm too bored at the moment, it would take half an hour. Anyone who has seen it happen before and elsewhere will know what I'm talking about.
Do I think money changes hands? No.
Do I think Utd get decisions through undue influence? Yes.
It only takes a ref to shade decisions 1% in a game to throw it in a teams favour, Utd are brilliant at taking advantage of that and fair play to them that they make the most of their opportunities. Trouble is they shouldn't be given those opportunities in the first place.
Graham Poll is on record as saying he would think very hard about giving a decision against them because it may have affected his career and what future games he was awarded, there is no reason the same mindset should not apply to othere refs.
As for the Drogba goal last year, Chelsea were denied a stonewall penalty in the same game,but no one bothers to mention it.
Thought I'd throw this post I made a while back into the mix.
Do I think Utd get decisions through undue influence? Yes.
It only takes a ref to shade decisions 1% in a game to throw it in a teams favour, Utd are brilliant at taking advantage of that and fair play to them that they make the most of their opportunities. Trouble is they shouldn't be given those opportunities in the first place.
Graham Poll is on record as saying he would think very hard about giving a decision against them because it may have affected his career and what future games he was awarded, there is no reason the same mindset should not apply to othere refs.
As for the Drogba goal last year, Chelsea were denied a stonewall penalty in the same game,but no one bothers to mention it.
Thought I'd throw this post I made a while back into the mix.
I don't think there is any corruption. Fact of the matter is they scored 3, Blackpool scored 2, if they had our defending nous they would of shut shop. Stupid twat Holloway though is to proud for that and hence lost the game. United are just one of those teams that thrive upon a team that is settled into doing them over, how many times has it happened since 99. Say what you want about the ref but if you don't play the football and defend your lead you will lose.
Definitely a penalty though.
Definitely a penalty though.