Am I being naive here, but why would our owners have gone ahead with this major redevelopment if they knew we were going to be found guilty of these 115 charges. I think the charges decision was made before any groundwork had started?
Exactly, show of strength , same as the savio transfer news sneaking out well before the summer window ... even if he may be going straight out on loan to girona againAm I being naive here, but why would our owners have gone ahead with this major redevelopment if they knew we were going to be found guilty of these 115 charges. I think the charges decision was made before any groundwork had started?
Because the whole shebang with the PL at the moment is to redefine the rules of PL football to prevent any new ambitious owners coming through. They are too late with us but the redshirts can just about live with that, knowing that eventually we will not be as strong on the pitch as we are today (but they will continue to keep coming for us). The "115", Everton situation and changing the rules about related parties is clearly to prevent anyone else being able to attract the sort of investment or take the risks we did, you can see that with the effect on the transfer market in January, instead the only areas investors will be able to achieve any reasonable return is through the current top 6. Our charges will fold, but they will claim victory behind some nonsense like "UK law time-barred" or "inter-governmental coercion", that narrative is already being discussed.Am I being naive here, but why would our owners have gone ahead with this major redevelopment if they knew we were going to be found guilty of these 115 charges. I think the charges decision was made before any groundwork had started?
They are not stupid, we will need the extra capacity when we play Maine Road FC.Am I being naive here, but why would our owners have gone ahead with this major redevelopment if they knew we were going to be found guilty of these 115 charges. I think the charges decision was made before any groundwork had started?
Rain on the lens my foot, they're tears of joy aren't they jrb :)A bit sad I know, but I just had to touch the crane section whilst I had the opportunity. :-)
Apologies for the slightly blurred pictures. I forgot to wipe the rain drizzle off the lens before taking the pictures.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A bit sad I know, but I just had to touch the crane section whilst I had the opportunity. :-)
Apologies for the slightly blurred pictures. I forgot to wipe the rain drizzle off the lens before taking the pictures.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The red tops have had the power since 92, Spurs jusy cosy up,however, I don't think for one minute us,Newcastle,Chelsea,Villa are doing nothing behind the scenes.If it's true the new rules are being challenged shows their monopoly won't be eternal.Because the whole shebang with the PL at the moment is to redefine the rules of PL football to prevent any new ambitious owners coming through. They are too late with us but the redshirts can just about live with that, knowing that eventually we will not be as strong on the pitch as we are today (but they will continue to keep coming for us). The "115", Everton situation and changing the rules about related parties is clearly to prevent anyone else being able to attract the sort of investment or take the risks we did, you can see that with the effect on the transfer market in January, instead the only areas investors will be able to achieve any reasonable return is through the current top 6. Our charges will fold, but they will claim victory behind some nonsense like "UK law time-barred" or "inter-governmental coercion", that narrative is already being discussed.
The other clubs are just too stupid to see it, even though we have warned them time and time again.
Fuck 'em.
FWIW, I've been in the padded/corporate area at Spurs behind the away fans, and there was no lack of atmosphere coming from this area. Even if our padded seating areas are not vocal, they are well and truly outnumbered by those that are likely to be.Pretty much replied to this before you posted it. I don't think you're overthinking it, I just think you're naturally a bit sceptical because we know revenues are the driving force behind decisions. But as I said above, they could have created plenty more hospitality areas within this design, and instead they've looked to maximise revenues from the wider facilities, the sky boxes and all that's really left to fret about is the impact of 700 padded seats amongst a wall of 9000 blues! Under 10%. It will be fine!
Am I being naive here, but why would our owners have gone ahead with this major redevelopment if they knew we were going to be found guilty of these 115 charges. I think the charges decision was made before any groundwork had started?
For the wank bank ;-)A bit sad I know, but I just had to touch the crane section whilst I had the opportunity. :-)
Apologies for the slightly blurred pictures. I forgot to wipe the rain drizzle off the lens before taking the pictures.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't know if this is the right place to post this but this is going to cause traffic problems whilst there doing it?
Plans for the proposed changes to the junction of Alan Turing Way and Ashton New Road | Manchester City Council
Manchester City Council download - Plans for the proposed changes to the junction of Alan Turing Way and Ashton New Road | Consultations and surveyswww.manchester.gov.uk
A bit sad I know, but I just had to touch the crane section whilst I had the opportunity. :-)
Apologies for the slightly blurred pictures. I forgot to wipe the rain drizzle off the lens before taking the pictures.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()