North Stand Construction Discussion

Centurions said:
And if they're going to share some sensitive business information to calm ruffled feathers wouldn't that be a good thing?
Click to expand...
Understand that and all, but would hardly appease broader ruffled feathers.

'Worried about the GA+ ruining the stand' 1894 - 'it won't trust us we've been told'. Would that be enough for people?
 
Coatigan said:
Understand that and all, but would hardly appease broader ruffled feathers.

'Worried about the GA+ ruining the stand' 1894 - 'it won't trust us we've been told'. Would that be enough for people?
Click to expand...
For most I think it would,as 1894 would be the first to complain if they thought the GA+was an issue, the one or two it's not enough for probably don't want to be appeased.Maybe less "we've been told"more "we've seen" though.
 
Corky said:
Current North Stand 2 occupants should have primacy over 1984 when it comes to what happens with their seats, due to the risk of being displaced.
Click to expand...
I think they will be to be fair, that said anyone sat in the GA+ seats will either have to move or pay the inflated price unfortunately as with the other premium/hospitality converted areas
 
Coatigan said:
Understand that and all, but would hardly appease broader ruffled feathers.

'Worried about the GA+ ruining the stand' 1894 - 'it won't trust us we've been told'. Would that be enough for people?
Click to expand...
Well I've never been worried about it so you're asking the wrong person ;)

It's up to the individuals involved, do they trust the club? 1894? City matters?

If the answer to all 3 is 'no' then there's not much you can do for them.
 
bluesmith said:
Under an NDA they won't to be able to say anything unless the club gives the ok to say it.
Click to expand...
TBH I thought as much.

At least Alex will be able tell us if he can or can’t say anything at all.

As I’ve posted previously, everything is shrouded in secrecy.

We’ll just have to wait until the club releases information.
 
jrb said:
TBH I thought as much.

At least Alex will be able tell us if he can or can’t say anything at all.

As I’ve posted previously, everything is shrouded in secrecy.

We’ll just have to wait until the club releases information.
Click to expand...

Is Alex not City Matters?

There could be a number of reasons for the NDA, like their plans not being fully set and once word is out there it is a bigger task the more people know.
 
Last edited:
Coatigan said:
Is Alex not City Matters?
Click to expand...
He is.

If it’s true 1894 have been asked to sign an NDA by the club, I would assume the other people at the meeting representing the fans will also have to sign an NDA. It doesn’t make sense to ask 1894 to sign an NDA, but not other fan representatives. Maybe Alex can at least confirm if he’s been asked to sign an NDA or not? Not that I want to put any pressure on Alex to do that. Sorry Alex.
 
Last edited:
PS.

There must been some new and significant decisions and information being revealed by the club at the meeting if the NDA is true?
 
jrb said:
PS.

There must been some new and significant decisions and information being revealed by the club at the meeting if the NDA is true?
Click to expand...
Yeah that's what I thought a couple pages back, won’t be just token generic stuff that perhaps means very little. Or a thing if timing, where they get to be the first to hear something that the club want to control announcing for effect they can benefit from (I mean in a good way).
 
Last edited:
Coatigan said:
Yeah that's what I thought a cluole pages back, won’t be just token generic stuff that perhaps means very little. Or a thing if timing, where they get to be the first to hear something that the club want to control announcing for effect they can benefit from (I mean in a good way).
Click to expand...

I’m part of 1894, not as much as I used to be, still happy to do the telescopic flags and 2 sticks, I know the lads, and they wouldn’t release that statement on the 1894 X/Twitter page if it wasn’t 100% true and had been discussed amongst themselves.
 
jrb said:
PS.

There must been some new and significant decisions and information being revealed by the club at the meeting if the NDA is true?
Click to expand...
NDAs are fairly standard for City, all contractors who were given the designs had to sign them and get their supply chain to sign them too.
 
bluesmith said:
NDAs are fairly standard for City, all contractors who were given the designs had to sign them and get their supply chain to sign them too.
Click to expand...
You would expect that though, perfectly understandable.

But consulting a fan group that represents fans aboutn an interests, and asking them for an nda, is imo, a bit less expected.

Again, not that I am calling it secretive or saying anything negative about it as mentioned previously, there will be balance in it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top