Gordyola
Well-Known Member
I thought the council just get a flat fee now with nothing extra regardless?
Everything he said was incorrect.
City pay a set amount per year ! It's a better deal for MCC and suits City to build it into their budgets !
I also thought it was £3m for the lease and an extra £1m per season(I forget the term used) so City can keep all revenues for none football events at the stadium. Whether or not the new expansion plans will mean the existing agreement will be amended again, I don't know.
FOI MCC
FOI Request to Manchester City Council
Re: - Request for Information - Commercial terms of Etihad Stadium rental by
Manchester City - reference number SOL/A33E8J
The following table details the basic rent paid by MCFC for the most recent
financial year, Apr 14 – Mar 15.
2014/15
Rental Income: 3,143,846
Naming Rights: 842,102
Champions League: 338,293
Champions League:112,764
Total charge Apr 14 - Mar 15: 4,437,004
There are variable payments made dependent on the clubs participation
and performance in European Competition. Additional rental income associated
with the clubs participation in the Champions League for the 2014/15 financial
year is detailed in the above table.
The stadium build was funded by Sport England and given to MCC however any proceeds for a sale would likely to have to go in full or part to Sport England
Last edited: