Taylor: Think back to West Ham two seasons ago. It's 2-2 in the penultimate game of the season and a City player (Sterling IIRC) is fouled in the box. A clear penalty but not given by Taylor so VAR steps in and he's asked to look at the screen. He changes his mind and Mahrez misses.
The point is that it looked nailed on at normal speed and VAR is there to help the refs. But VAR shows all the angles, and it looked a foul from every single camera angle. Worse still, many camera angles showed Taylor had an uninterrupted view of the incident. So why didn't he award it?
At this point I'd like no replies from those who say he's useless, corrupt or a rag tosser. Or any combination of those.
I want an explanation from those who think he's none of those things. He had a clear view of a foul in the box but didn't give the penalty. And had he given it and VAR thought he was wrong they could overrule him. He didn't give a penalty because he didn't want to give a penalty.
And it's bloody worrying because he is one of the better (or least worse) refs when City aren't involved.
Rodri got punished for being a dick, Taylor will probably be rewarded for it.