A
A
Anonymous
Guest
The Fat el Hombre said:
All will be named and shamed if come May 10th.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Now..... About the Mancini Out Threads.
- Thread starter scorer
- Start date
All will be named and shamed if come May 10th.
The Fat el Hombre
Well-Known Member
Immaculate Pasta said:The Fat el Hombre said:The fucking morons who make those threads should be named and shamed - thaksinsoldier and chazmcfc not to mention that thick **** with the fish as his name who was telling us that Mancini is a clown
Absolutely ridiculous people questioning a proven guy who's adapting to the prem and learning about his new team and has only been in charge for a couple of months. No excuse for it. Just the same as writing Average Carlos off after 2 months or whatever it was
All will be named and shamed if come May 10th.
Fingers crossed we get to ram it down the fuckers throats
squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
i just don't see how you can pontificate about supporting the manager when you don't follow your own advicescorer said:squirtyflower said:pity you didn't think the same regarding the previous incumbent
Why??? He was and still is a useless unproven football manager, despite spending £200m +.
Some could see that early on, others it took time and there are still some that think he's quality.
It's all about opinion
scorer said:squirtyflower said:pity you didn't think the same regarding the previous incumbent
Why??? He was and still is a useless unproven football manager, despite spending £200m +.
Some could see that early on, others it took time and there are still some that think he's quality.
It's all about opinion
He is hardly useless.
He got his teams further than any Manager did with City in the last twenty years. However, he is probably suited to a club that operates on a much lesser budget than we had. But that doesn't make him useless, merely one that is better suited to building up a team without the vast expectations that City as a Club now have.
I find it sad that Hughes is castigated like this.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,556
The Fat el Hombre said:The fucking morons who make those threads should be named and shamed - thaksinsoldier and chazmcfc not to mention that thick **** with the fish as his name who was telling us that Mancini is a clown
Absolutely ridiculous people questioning a proven guy who's adapting to the prem and learning about his new team and has only been in charge for a couple of months. No excuse for it. Just the same as writing Average Carlos off after 2 months or whatever it was
I have come to the conclusion that you really have to take this place with a truck full of salt.
98.4% of this forum are utter fools.
scorer
Well-Known Member
mackenzie said:He is hardly useless.
He got his teams further than any Manager did with City in the last twenty years. However, he is probably suited to a club that operates on a much lesser budget than we had. But that doesn't make him useless, merely one that is better suited to building up a team without the vast expectations that City as a Club now have.
I find it sad that Hughes is castigated like this.
As I say Sharon I really did not rate him and it is about opinion.
I feel we are a much stronger unit right now even though Mancini has not yet had time to bring in his players.... and that is after what... 3 months.
Sorry if my opinion offends City fans, that is not intentional, but I am not sorry for having the opinion.
jimharri
Moderator
Spot on.mackenzie said:He is hardly useless.
He got his teams further than any Manager did with City in the last twenty years. However, he is probably suited to a club that operates on a much lesser budget than we had. But that doesn't make him useless, merely one that is better suited to building up a team without the vast expectations that City as a Club now have.
I find it sad that Hughes is castigated like this.
So when fat-boy alan greene was asked,"what has Mancini brought to City,that MH didn't?"His answer was "Nothing!",he might have been wrong???Shands said:Just quickly worked this out from the programme, pretty sure it's right but feel free to double check and humble me if I've got it wrong!
10 league Games Pre Mancini: W 2 D 7 L 1 - Points = 13
Goals For 18 Goals Against 19 = -1
10 League games post Mancini: W 6 D 2 L 2 - Points = 20
Goals For 19 Goals Against 8 = +11
I think all in all we should be satisfied with that. We've picked up more points, improved hugely at the back and to my surprise scored more goals too. If you break it down into home and away fixtures both stack up more favourably than the prior 10 games (13 points to 9 at home, 7 points to 4 away) and the comparitve fixtures (i.e teams we've met twice in these runs) are also slightly better since Mancini arrived.
This is not meant in any way as a dig at Hughes who I did like, it's just an attempt to highlight that despite some of the doom and gloom that's been banded about in recent weeks we've actually seen an improvment in our overall return and performed pretty well! Yes the brand of football hasn't been that pleasing on the eye at times but we're still scoring more goals so imagine what it will be like when the players do settle fully in to the new system! I'm a big fan of Mancini and was from what I saw of his days at Inter, I hope he's given the time and support to take our club places.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,556
mackenzie said:scorer said:Why??? He was and still is a useless unproven football manager, despite spending £200m +.
Some could see that early on, others it took time and there are still some that think he's quality.
It's all about opinion
He is utterly clueless.
He got his teams further than any Manager did with City in the last twenty years whilst spending more than any manager in history. However, he is probably suited to a club in the conference that operates on a much lesser budget than we had. But that does make him useless, merely one that is better suited to building up a pub team without the vast expectations that City as a Club now have.
I find it funny as fuck that Hughes is castigated like this.
edited for accuracy.
;)
scorer said:mackenzie said:He is hardly useless.
He got his teams further than any Manager did with City in the last twenty years. However, he is probably suited to a club that operates on a much lesser budget than we had. But that doesn't make him useless, merely one that is better suited to building up a team without the vast expectations that City as a Club now have.
I find it sad that Hughes is castigated like this.
As I say Sharon I really did not rate him and it is about opinion.
I feel we are a much stronger unit right now even though Mancini has not yet had time to bring in his players.... and that is after what... 3 months.
Sorry if my opinion offends City fans, that is not intentional, but I am not sorry for having the opinion.
And neither am I for thinking that Hughes deserves a little more respect than the word "useless."
People didn't rate Hughes from the word "go." I wasn't particularly inspired by his appointment I have to say, but I was willing to at least give him a chance.
And that is where the divisions happened.
Some posters hated the very fact he was given the Managership, and I think it ruled their "opinions" from day one. That wasn't necessarily based upon his possible qualities...... more a hatred of "rags" and wanting a BIG name after Sven.
You cannot say, with any true credibility, that you were proven correct simply because you thought him the "wrong man" from the off. That smacks of prejudice (see my earlier comments).
How can you even imply that you based your judgement simply on his results when you wanted him out from Day One??