bowdonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 1,256
hertsblue said:18 months isnt really a knee jerk reaction is it.
The amount of people on sky who keep coming up with "lost only 2 all season" and "in the semi finals" shows you none of them know the facts.
"Only lost 2 all season" = How many have we actually won. Has there been any game when we have pretty much dominated. 2 wins in 11 is the fact.
"In the semi finals"= yes, fantastic. But we have faced an average Crystal Palace and Scunthorpe, a reserve Fulham, and Arsenals kids to get there. yes city of old would have probably messed up somewhere but after 200 odd million spent, you expect us to get through these.
The fact is, Hughes had chances, was given chances and backing, but the team defensivly was looking worse by the week.
How we are still 6th with a game in hand after 2 wins in 11 shows you what a strange year it is with everyone taking points off everyone else. Any other year we wouldnt be in with a sniff.
Villa have opened a gap on us, and the way we were defending and playing that gap would have only got wider by the week
Finally .... THIS!!! ^^^
Personally, I was surprised that Hughes wasn't left in position until the summer, but it has to be said that -
1 - He wasn't ADUG's choice, and yet they gave him 18 months and an open chequebook. That is a decent run, and Hughes will get a £7m+ payout, which should help soften the blow.
2 - Despite the collpase of our defensive ability over the last couple of months, nobody could have predicted the poor form of ALL the "big 4" teams recently, and this has presented us with an opportunity that we might not get again for many years.
3 - Replacing Hughes with Mancini IS a gamble IMO - but most of us would agree that we showed no signs of hitting consistent top form recently, and we all know that new managers can be a catalyst for positive change. So I think we have a better chance of turning a corner with Mancini, on the basis I coulnd't see it coming otherwise.
Oh - and fuck off Holt.