Our current Uefa coeficient ranking

oakiecokie said:
And look who`s fucked City up.YCNMIU. :

The big fallers? Well, that's not hard to work out, either. All those smaller clubs that have had the temerity to be successful recently, with new money. Villarreal, down 14 places; Manchester City, 11th to 16th; Paris Saint-Germain, seventh to 10th; Napoli, 17th to 20th; Atletico Madrid, down one; Athletic Bilbao, down eight.

England's representative in this grand carve-up was Gill and — surprise, surprise — Manchester United rise from 20th to 12th under the new system, despite failing to qualify for the Champions League in two of the last three seasons. How Gill is still regarded as a credible presence in football administration, heaven knows.

He recommended the Football Association back the discredited Michel Platini for UEFA president — and what a delight that he will speak at UEFA's congress today, despite being banned from all football activity — and every move he makes seems to be for the financial benefit of the biggest clubs, and one in particular.

Manchester United made a pig's ear of the succession to Sir Alex Ferguson, and have reached the last eight of the Champions League once since appearing in the final in 2011.

But no matter. Along comes Gill to make it right, and ensure they stay above Manchester City in one table at least. City are 11th, United 20th in the current system. Thanks to Gill and his cohorts, United flip to 12th, City plummet to 16th.
Click to expand...


What a surprise that United are at the heart of every rancid and corrupt process undertaken in the football world - not !
 
but how funny would it be if manchester city win the champions league 3 times in the next 4 seasons

THEM 3 STARS WOULD LOOK GREAT WITH THE NEW BADGE
 
There should be a major outcry about these proposed changes by every club which is disadvantaged for the sake of the likes of the Rags and Milan clubs - another totally unfair and corrupt change to protect the " chosen ones " .
 
aguero93:20 said:
Exactly, I'd rather play decent teams like BMG and Roma then cannon fodder like Celtic and Milan, so getting the shit cunts out of the lower pots can only be a good thing.
Click to expand...
If the latest proposal was brought in, top 4 finishes could see Milan in pot 2 along with the Dippers.

A poor CL and non-winning PL season could mean City dropping into pot 3 with a hot/cold ball draw against Barcelona/Real and Bayern.
 
TheBlueDune said:
If the latest proposal was brought in, top 4 finishes could see Milan in pot 2 along with the Dippers.

A poor CL and non-winning PL season could mean City dropping into pot 3 with a hot/cold ball draw against Barcelona/Real and Bayern.
Click to expand...
It's not in for a couple of seasons though, so even if it stands we'll have replaced our poor 11/12 coefficient and our shite 12/13 coefficient hopefully with two good runs.
 
Has the previous European cup history thing been confirmed? Is it two separate issues with coefficient seeding and how the money is paid out?
 
aguero93:20 said:
It's not in for a couple of seasons though, so even if it stands we'll have replaced our poor 11/12 coefficient and our shite 12/13 coefficient hopefully with two good runs.
Click to expand...


Agreed but the " history teams " will still benefit , and that can't be right .
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
Has the previous European cup history thing been confirmed? Is it two separate issues with coefficient seeding and how the money is paid out?
Click to expand...
It's been confirmed but it's creating a good bit of fuss and might be reversed before it can come into effect. Their new coefficient will bump up their seeding and increase the amount of money they're being paid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.