Watching kolarov again this morning, friendly or not, it is obvious he is not capable of playing against the best teams in Europe. Clichy is also suspect especially going forward. I think the op may have a point
Can we leave Kolorov in Melbourne?
Watching kolarov again this morning, friendly or not, it is obvious he is not capable of playing against the best teams in Europe. Clichy is also suspect especially going forward. I think the op may have a point
Spot on , we do need somebody else in these positions to give us some width instead of the usual square passing or backwards passing when it comes down to these two.I am not sure Clichy or Kolarov are "good enough" to be honest. They both have decent games from time to time but too often the standard is just not good enough. Clichy offers nothing going forward - we might as well play another centre half at left back. And Kolarov's defending varies between absolutely woeful and "acceptable".
For a top 4 team, they are just about OK, but for a team looking to win it every year and to get deep into the CL, neither of them are of the required standard.
There's no maybe about it. Kolarov is just awfulClichy isn't weak - Kolarov maybe. I think it's just that most managers know their midfield is weaker than yours so they bang it out to the flanks for a 1v1. If you had the world's greatest LB then Zabba would be strongly tested. A DeJong or Barry would recognise a pattern & help sort it.
So why was Kolarov about 5 yards behind the defensive line playing Ronaldo onside?Isn't it more to to do with the system we play rather than the actual people that are occupying the fullback roles.
They can either be specialist defenders or auxilery wingers... Not both.
If you're using them, primarily as auxilary wingers, and playing the ridiculously high line that we do, isn't it inevitable that the opposition's front players will continually exploit the massive spaces behind them, whoever's in possession of the shirt?
Just asking.