On the other point being made in the thread, like Corky's here:
Corky said:
Tourists not fans. The same who 'supported' Liverpool in the 1980s, United in the 1990s.
Teams are named after places for a reason, and it is a cultural thing. I can't understand anyone supporting a team from a different country or even county just because the standard is higher than their country. "You have to have an English team" from a new City fan of two years at the Hearts game was baffling.
I blame the television companies.
...this is my exact outlook on these tourist fans.
But they are different from other fans who aren't Mancunians and aren't tourists. I know a Midlander City fan and met a bloke from Swindon, both have been everywhere with City over the decades.
I love rugby league and think the NRL is the highest quality league in either code of rugby and am an avid watcher of it; yet I don't have a team I "support" in that league. I wouldn't dream of supporting a team in any sport where I don't have a long family history of supporting, I don't have a local interest in or the accent of that place.
However for those who want to do that, I have absolutely no problem with them doing so. If some bloke from Olso or Ohio thinks City are great and buys our kits and come over once every five years for a game, then good for him. And good for the club as he's briging more revenue in for us! Even though I'd never feel comfortable doing it, myself, it doesn't mean I disagree with others doing it.
One thing I
have always wondered over the years though, is: wouldn't Ireland have a decent thriving football league without at the United Liverpool and Celtic glory hunters? (Not a dig, a genuine question I've thought of from time-to-time.)