Paris 2024 Olympics Thread - 11th August (pg 430)

One more medal overall though. UK Sport measure performance on raw medal count, they don't care much for the colour given there can be such a fine line between gold and silver. They targeted 50-70 medals so we're on the stronger end of the performance scale with 65.

Also, really important is they wanted a broader coverage in medals across different sports, and they have achieved that in a big way. By my count, Team GB have medals in 23 different sporting categories, the broadest spread of any nation ever. In Tokyo they had medals in 18 different sports. We compete at a high level in nearly everything, and I think that diversity is the best thing about our performance.
So would 66 bronzes be better?
 
So would 66 bronzes be better?

By the way UK Sport chooses to measure performance, yes. They're not just looking at this games in isolation, they're trying to continuously increase their medal count at each games. They see the total medal count as a better indicator of long-term success than just number of golds which can be very volatile.

Look at the Netherlands, they have finished above us this time but with only 34 medals in total, will they do that next time? It's very unlikely. They have done incredibly well but it only takes a small shift in performance and a few of their gold medallists falling off, they don't have a stable platform to replicate this next time round. Team GB on the other hand probably have 40+ of their 51 silver and bronze medalists who are well positioned to pick up a gold next time round.

If the medals keep increasing you will pick up golds by virtue of being in and around the top 3, it's just probability.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.