Come on, he's a lot better than 'very average'.City would be getting slagged to fuck if we was willing to pay the fees being spoken about for this very average player, only ginger scholes has come out and said he ain't worth the amount 40/50 m tops
Exactly,he's a fantastic player,that the vast majority of us would have been ecstatic to see in our shirt.Come on, he's a lot better than 'very average'.
Personally i don't rate him as highly as his pricetag suggests i should. Is he twice the player De Bruyne is? Absolutely not, he's not even better at all.
But for similar money i'd much rather have him instead of Sterling and Stones.
He is overrated, playing in Italy he has all the time in the world. Will find it a lot tougher here, as we saw in Euros he will go missing for long periods
We'll see.Not twice the player De Bruyne is obviously but he's 3 times the player Sterling.
Yep. If we'd signed him for the price we would have been slaughtered, but I think the Rags will also get slaughtered it they pay it. I would also suggest that if we'd signed him then we would have a lot of posts saying he is world class, he would only sign because of Guardiola, it would be us making a statement on the world stage by signing the most sought after midfielder in the world.If he wasn't that good, the Pogba transfer thread wouldn't have reached past above the 3 thousands pages ...
He is good, and has potential to become a world beater. That is the kind of silly money you have to pay to attract these high profile players nowadays.
I thought he'd already signed. I typed 'Manchester United' into Google, and this showed up on the right hand side of the results page: