George Hannah has made some excellent points - as you would expect from someone who has supported the club long enough to remember a great inside forward - and I think many of those who wanted to see the end of Roberto need reminding of a few more. The owner and board didn't get rid of Roberto to bring in Pep, or Mourinho, and many of the "outers" never considered Pellegrini until he was clearly the man the club wanted. Now, let's remember that our loyalty is to City rather than any individual and let's refrain from factious intrigue against the new manager. Some of those posting on here are not helping already. There is a tendency to suggest that the "Mancini years" are some dark tunnel from which we are now emerging to take our place in the sun. Well, we actually won our first trophy for 35 years, our first FA cup for 42 years and our first league title for 43 years in that time. And to hear some posters we did it with a centre forward whose first touch is abysmal, no width at all, a midfield lacking in creativity and so on. A wonder Mancini saved us from relegation! Especially after the mess made of the last August transfer window. The Mancini years are over, but they were years of substantial achievement, and we have world class players at the club. I hope the club and manager get the players they want this summer, whoever they are, and that they help us compete and play the football the manager wants but it is unlikely they will be better, individually, than the likes of Silva, Aguero, Vinnie, Zaba etc etc if they are as good. So claims that with Pellegrini we'll have the PL won by February are the obvious nonsense I hope they were meant to be.
Pellegrini seems to have many excellent qualities, he may even prove better for the club than Mancini but he will not be well served by the mindless, unrealistic expectations that give way, when we don't win the first ten PL matches outright, to disillusionment by November and calls for Mourinho or "Pep" or "anyone" by February.