Lets not forget Pep has a coach on staff who is a netball coach by profession.
Really? Who's that?
He also has his best friend "the Maradona of Water Polo" Manel Estiarte.
Lets not forget Pep has a coach on staff who is a netball coach by profession.
Really? Who's that?
He also has his best friend "the Maradona of Water Polo" Manel Estiarte.
You dont have to tell me about that, I nearly lost my job over it at the time, having been at a lunch in his honour only a month before it all kicked off.
I'd say from my pov as an ex coach that what Pep does is fundamentally different in that Pep allows the opponents to dictate his approach. We actually arent trying to impose our philsophy on a team. Rather, we wait to see what they do and if the opponent does a) then we do b) and so on. It's very close in philosophy to either option football or the run and shoot offense with a "take what they give you" approach.
Lets not forget Pep has a coach on staff who is a netball coach by profession.
Who's honour, paterno or Sandusky?? I kind of felt sorry for Joe until I researched the case further, he should of never put the institution before his conscience, regardless if he reported it or not...
I think you misunderstood where I was coming from, I didn't mean tactics as in 'mirrored', more the philosophy behind them, also the approach used by Lombardi is adapted by every top level coach to date..
Hasn't Manuel Estiarte rocked up yet?? Water polo phenomenon (:
Yeh you're absolutely right mate. Especially on Saturday when the full backs were tucking in and Fernandinho was dropping back in to the back line.
Funny how these things coms back around. Not seen the WM formation since reading Nappers Golden Goals in Primary school, and he got it from the 1950s I think! Way ahead of his time was Napper.
Sandusky's unfortunately. He uttered the creepiest line in his speech I'll ever hear "the one thing I miss most from football is those boys in that locker room". in context it's terrifying.
In attack it's very similar the old W-M formation used in the early days of football. Ignoring the names for the positions this is essentially how we line up in attack.
![]()
EDIT
It's obviously fluid and people don't hold their positions but when we have the ball with the keeper that's a pretty good approximation.
Creepy as fuck but that's institutional abuse mate, the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he doesn't exist!!!!
the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he doesn't exist!!!!
"You want me to shoot the devil in the back, what if i missed agent Kujan"
The greatest trick anyone ever pulled was convincing the naive the Devil exists
Good post.In attack it's very similar the old W-M formation used in the early days of football. Ignoring the names for the positions this is essentially how we line up in attack.
![]()
EDIT
It's obviously fluid and people don't hold their positions but when we have the ball with the keeper that's a pretty good approximation.
isnt that Liviticus 20,
I think someone mentioned earlier that Fernandinho could potentially play the inverted fullback role when Gundogan returnsThe weak point is our FB not quite good passer and would be problem when facing with big teams.
I see that's why Pep says he can plays many positions, centre halfback, inside forward (replace KDB last match) and left/right halfback in this new system.I think someone mentioned earlier that Fernandinho could potentially play the inverted fullback role when Gundogan returns
Does anyone else think City need another goalscorer to support Aguero? Right now he's the only proven goalscorer in the starting lineup.
Pep wants to use the fullbacks as CM's so the wingers get a 1v1. However Aguero's the only goalscorer in the box for the wingers to get the ball into. Plus he's not exactly the greatest at heading either.
Instead of Sane, signing a supporting goalscorer like Reus or Griezmann would have made more sense.