Peter Walton..

[bobbyowenquiff]

Fuck off Ming's. You are as shit as football as knowing the rules.

There have been hundreds of goals over the years where a defender miskicks the ball to an attacker in an offside position who puts the ball in the net. Once the defender plays the ball the attacker is onside. Goalkeepers often do this with poor clearances for example. It is 100 per cent a goal. If Rodri had tackled Mings before Rodri played it he would have been offside. It is just another fake narrative to attack City with. Mings is an idiot if he doesn't know the rule.

 

[eyalluvitt]

Rio the fucking thick twat. Has the rule explained to him then says bad decision by the ref. How is this arse on TV?

He's still Bitter about the 6-1

 

[ultimateharold]

No different to when an attacker is offside, ball goes out to a non offside winger, who then crosses in for a goal where the scorer can get there quicker to being offside in the first place, which happens tens of times a season with no outrage.

 

[Gray]

Oh the ironing
You don’t know the rules of this forum
No swearing allowed in thread titles

How about “Peter Walton........Chump”

 

[meeesh]

Not covering themselves in any glory,in any shape or form are BT,the inept fuckers Sky employ are being made to look quite clever now

 

[brazilians hurt]

BT trying to rewrite the rules to fit their own narrative.They really showed themselves up last night to be the biased shit broadcaster they are. Contrast their reaction to the United result with Humphrey purring like a sewing machine and the half wit in full ejaculation ecstasy.

 

[trublue55]

This fkin wanker is clueless..

Paid by BT to provide unbiased, refereeing input during games doesn't even know the fkin offside rule yet he's on my TV screen gobbing off that Bernie's goal should have been disallowed..

Fatso Moss and the faceless knobs in the VAR studio thought otherwise though you bent scouse twat..!

Changed his tune in the studio and lost all fkin credibility in the process..!

He can fcuk right off and take that diving, greasy, cheating twat Grealish with him..


Brilliant win given next to no credit for by a bunch of sad bastards at BT!!

No offence mate, WHAT CREDIBILITY ?

If you called that useless , bent, c**t, a waste of space, you would be being unbelievably kind to him.
Credibility..........NEVER had any!

 

[the-ecstacy-of-eight]

There have been hundreds of goals over the years where a defender miskicks the ball to an attacker in an offside position who puts the ball in the net. Once the defender plays the ball the attacker is onside. Goalkeepers often do this with poor clearances for example. It is 100 per cent a goal. If Rodri had tackled Mings before Rodri played it he would have been offside. It is just another fake narrative to attack City with. Mings is an idiot if he doesn't know the rule.

Of course he knows the law, he's just putting out a tweet because he's realised that it's now become a "controversial" goal and he want to plead how unfair it all is.

 

[Dirty Harry]

I see Wio had no problem with this Nani goal years ago v Spurs, was this in the spirit of the game ?

 

[markbmcfc]

Needs to get a case of bad cat aids this bloke.

A proper gizzard.