You need 115 charges you fucking mentalist
I chuckled at that..
You need 115 charges you fucking mentalist
I know what you're saying but to be fair apart from when he was bullied he's never been away.Sorry if mentioned .Rabin is back.https://twitter.com/city_rabin/status/1624030734662123522?t=umDqvj7MHt9MleZnE3DaYw&s=19
Kevin Garside. Just another lazy prick who can't be bothered to read all the documents from the CAS case. Another article riddled with factual errors from a cut-and-paste merchant. The state of the English media.
So is acid.Sorry bud, if I ignore her content, she’s pretty hot.
I’m amazed at how many journalists are allowed to put out shit without actually reading about, and being knowledgeable about, the thing they’re writing about.
My job involves a shit load of preparation before a final recommendation/analysis which is regulated yet these lazy cunts can do so without issue as long as it fits a narrative.
Unfortunately our Journalists rely on clickbaits , they pander to the likes of the rags , dippers etc .I deal with journalists in my job every week. As a rule they are kind, thorough, gather a lot of information from lots of sources but only use a little, and fair. The very few that aren’t don’t get their calls nor emails returned.
But I deal with US business journalists. UK football journalists might as well be from Uranus as a rule. Fuck, they don’t report — they write editorials. It’s astounding to me. Criticiz(s)e America all you like but I wouldn’t trade our daily news reporters for yours in a million years.
This. It has been going on since our owners came in. We do not have to prove our innocence.Have to say.
Pep is sheer class.
He’s handling this beautifully.
He is very subtly saying to them, have a good look at your own behaviour.
Putting the point out there. When we are proved innocent again, what then. Are you going to redress all the damage you have done.
One question asked from the back summed up the ignorance and the style of reporting for me.
It basically amounted to, if this drags on for months and years of you having to prove your innocence what is the toll on the team etc.
well there you have the crux of it all for me. If this was a court of law or anything credibly close to the standards of one, there is no onus of proving innocence. The onus would be on the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of the accused. And the accused would be within their rights to remain silent and only address the charges which would require adequate evidence.
You would have been given a first if I was still marking papers; concise, reinforcing facts with superb reference and leaving no room for debate
A post that deserves revisiting when this is done and dusted!
It’s shocking to me. It’s just so antithetical to the way journalism is taught and, and least in my experience, practiced. Of course I’m NOT shocked really but comparing it to what I know first-hand, it never ceases to amaze (and infuriate) me.Unfortunately our Journalists rely on clickbaits , they pander to the likes of the rags , dippers etc .