cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,564
4-3 was after extra time.
Macken with the winner
4-3 was after extra time.
Just another example of media twisting words and that was all they could glean from the conference. Pep knew exactly what he was saying.He used him as an example. He said that you would have to ask the CEO's and then stated him as an example. Nothing wrong with that.
It's not an independent panel really am I am sure City have plans should that happen.
I am expecting them to find us guilty as it's as bent as a 9 bob note.
The chairman is a gooner season ticket holder his club was behind that letter !.
You cant have an organisation which is judge and jury and not right to appeal that is a kangaroo court.
This is why I think City have some really big dirt of a few clubs. It was very odd how all the managers keep quiet. Klopp normally cant help himself remember his " it's a bad day for football " when CAS cleared City.
Now the pl CEOs are crying over Peps presser lol they seem very sensitive for some reason, very nervous.
That’s a fair point, mate, although surely in a public organisation that type of culture is much less likely.Whilst I think you’re absolutely right, the only reticence one could have, in relation to any alleged conspiracy, is around leadership and culture and how that is within any organisation. If there is a culture of openness, honesty and transparency, then fraud, dishonesty and corruption would be virtually impossible.
If, however, there is a ‘toxic’ culture around a business and what’s ‘unacceptable’ is, in fact, acceptable, then the likelihood of things going awry increases hugely. Someone questions something and, if the answer from the hierarchy is, “that’s just how we do things here” it can quite quickly become the norm and that is often the driver for scandal, as opposed to a planned conspiracy.
We just can't keep a clean sheet can we?CAS was 2-1 wasn’t it? One of the votes went to UEFA so a 3-0 was never on the cards.
I think this is just the the city in us (expect the worse) the people on the independent panel have there reputation there career's on the line. It's much more than who they support imagine what our lawyers would do to them if found guilty without substantial evidence?? We would drag them through every court in the land and ruin them it's just not in there interest to give anything but a fair hearing on the evidence provided.It's not an independent panel really am I am sure City have plans should that happen.
I am expecting them to find us guilty as it's as bent as a 9 bob note.
The chairman is a gooner season ticket holder his club was behind that letter !.
You cant have an organisation which is judge and jury and not right to appeal that is a kangaroo court.
This is why I think City have some really big dirt of a few clubs. It was very odd how all the managers keep quiet. Klopp normally cant help himself remember his " it's a bad day for football " when CAS cleared City.
Now the pl CEOs are crying over Peps presser lol they seem very sensitive for some reason, very nervous.
Probably, but Lady Hale .......Not a chance at all.
Indeed, it won't bother him in the slightest that Pannik apparently is a Chelsea fan :)
He can be given an honorary knighthood.He can’t be knighted.