PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[TinFoilHat]

Cann: Rashford was interfering with play offside. No goal.

Attwell: *telling city players to go away* Ok Mate.

OliVAR: Give the goal.

Attwell: Darren says Rashford was interfering?

OliVAR:Give the goal and fuck City.

Attwell: Mike says goal. *Whistles and points to centre circle*

 

[Trojan1962]

We fans may want to see that but I don't think the club would do it. They might be the only friend we have!

Friends don’t do what they did if it’s true. They want to keep Vinnie contacts at the club in case they want us to loan them a player. They will not be a direct rival to us at any time. City will get next to nothing out of it in my opinion

 

[David Kloppesh]

"Sheikh Mansour went to court in his Lamborghini"

in his pocket two paychecks for mancini

 

[John Wayne]

I've spilled one previously, which was the dossier he was central in putting together in 2012, that saw Walton disappear to the USA and Mason removed from our games for a while. It also saw Mike Riley come up to the Etihad to do the Q&A with Points of Blue.

Another was passing on key information that the club only partly acted on in the 2019/20 season. Had they acted fully, it's quite possible Liverpool wouldn't have won the title. They did act on other Liverpool-related information but it's something I suspect they already knew.

I always suspected Walton's repeated appointments to Everton home fixtures and resulting performances were incredibly suspect. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen such bias before or since the 2010/11 game.

I find it hard to believe however, that City would have in their possession evidence with the potential to stop Liverpool winning the league and not use it.

 

[hcblue95]

I've spilled one previously, which was the dossier he was central in putting together in 2012, that saw Walton disappear to the USA and Mason removed from our games for a while. It also saw Mike Riley come up to the Etihad to do the Q&A with Points of Blue.

Another was passing on key information that the club only partly acted on in the 2019/20 season. Had they acted fully, it's quite possible Liverpool wouldn't have won the title. They did act on other Liverpool-related information but it's something I suspect they already knew.

Interesting. I assume the last bit is the hacking but I can't think of what he could have discovered that might have won us the league in 19/20.

 

[John Wayne]

Interesting. I assume the last bit is the hacking but I can't think of what he could have discovered that might have won us the league in 19/20.

Lots of suspicion around doping and the misuse of TUEs, but all speculation.

 

[City Raider]

Would love if Mansour not just coming to defend but deliver the smoking gun

 

[hcblue95]

Lots of suspicion around doping and the misuse of TUEs, but all speculation.

Hmm I feel like all clubs are doping. I find it hard to believe any club wouldn't be, it's such a huge advantage.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

I always suspected Walton's repeated appointments to Everton home fixtures and resulting performances were incredibly suspect. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen such bias before or since the 2010/11 game.

I find it hard to believe however, that City would have in their possession evidence with the potential to stop Liverpool winning the league and not use it.

They didn't have evidence. They were told in August 2019 that there was a fix in place and that involved Liverpool winning the league. He offered his help to counter that and they didn't take him up on it.

 

[Mid Wales blue]

With the greatest respect to you both, that’s nonsense. There are a few legal experts on here, including KCs, whose input is greatly valued by many, myself included.

And not forgetting, “the drunken small claims one”.