remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Duck ?Good effort, but it was actually Jack Gaughan and his username is pretty lame tbh.
Duck ?Good effort, but it was actually Jack Gaughan and his username is pretty lame tbh.
Good effort, but it was actually Jack Gaughan and his username is pretty lame tbh.
Just in case anybody else wants a read.You know what. After that united farce of a goal, and the year of the liverpool title win (another farce refereeing wise) I am hoping that they will find us guilty of all the fucking infractions and then some. I am tired of all the innuendo, and the fact that we want the moral high ground while our reputation takes a battering makes me unhappy. I do hope we are playing dirty because sure as hell everyone else is playing super dirty. Whether it's Madrid players feigning injury in a semi final, a geriatric loon accusing us of financial doping when you invest in your business, or farcical refereeing decisions or Fergie time. I've bloody had it. I hope we are dirty, because everyone else is just filthy, and I'm sick and tired of watching it in the open while people ignore it.
Khelafi from PSG is on the executive council while they made a super mockery of FFP. Chelsea spend north of half a billion in 6 months because rules are adjusted when convenient. Manure in ridiculous debt, underperforming for a decade while we have been the standard bearers for that time and no one can believe we can get a penny more in sponsorship. What fucking delusion.
Find us guilty you scumbags. City will still be here. Our owners will still be here. And most importantly we the fans will still be here.
FIND US GUILTY ALREADY. I DARE YOU YOU CUNTS, AND WATCH WHAT HAPPENS TO THIS HOUSE OF CARDS.
There, rant over. I think I will go and have a lie down. Maybe even take a break from footie.
There you go Jim. You wanted back on topic.
If it’s the Daily Mail, they will be looking for information to defame it rather than investigate it.@Ric I received a PM from a certain Northern correspondent from the Daily Mail yesterday, who expressed an interest in covering the story.
Judging by some of the shite spouted in the media there's probably more than a few.So we have journalist spying in on Bluemoon tell em nowt.
If it’s the Daily Mail, they will be looking for information to defame it rather than investigate it.
A high profile goalkeeper?We had one. A big gambler who accumulated debts owed to some very dodgy people. City were convinced he was match-fixing and even went to the police. It's absolutely not just lower league players.
Strange decision to let off a major rival with financial recompense if they were up to something major, sadly this is another story that has got out of control.Interesting. As we all know we settled out of court and it was small news in the media ( No surprise there ) and quickly forgotten. I'm wondering if as part of the agreement we were promised the dirty tricks against us would stop. If that was the case we now know never to trust rats.
Strange decision to let off a major rival with financial recompense if they were up to something major, sadly this is another story that has got out of control.
Not sure what it has todo with our case and the fact that we agreed a financial settlement I would think would include a non disclosure clause.I would imagine it would be something the club reminds the premier league of with regards to breaking rules etc though? They facilitated a cover up of hacking by one of their biggest clubs?