PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Cobwebcat said:
The one thing that keeps niggling at me is that we won CAS 2-1 and not 3-0.

It makes me think that there is a chance the PL appeal panel could see it the same way the losing CAS guy did…whatever the hell that was.
Click to expand...
We'll be fine as long as it doesn't go to penalties...
 
Cobwebcat said:
The one thing that keeps niggling at me is that we won CAS 2-1 and not 3-0.

It makes me think that there is a chance the PL appeal panel could see it the same way the losing CAS guy did…whatever the hell that was.
Click to expand...

In the face of the evidence it’s hard to see how any lawyer with any integrity could vote against…. But he / she was nominated by UEFA so probably a paid up member of the brown envelope brigade.
 
Cobwebcat said:
The one thing that keeps niggling at me is that we won CAS 2-1 and not 3-0.

It makes me think that there is a chance the PL appeal panel could see it the same way the losing CAS guy did…whatever the hell that was.
Click to expand...
it was always going to be a 2 1 decsision when uefa and city nominated a panel memeber
 
Manc123 said:
it was always going to be a 2 1 decsision when uefa and city nominated a panel memeber
Click to expand...
As I said earlier I don’t go along with CAS being biased either way.

If we believe CAS are biased we might as well throw in the towel with a PL nominated panel.

If we take the blue specs off one guy thought we had done something wrong. The fact that two didn’t makes me think we have a strong case not a water tight case.
 
Gorton_Tubster said:
Repeating this post. If you have time watch it. And well done Cheesy Cheeseman for getting this on a podcast.

Click to expand...

Thanks for that, interesting.

IRef clearly an attempt to be able to veto spending by individual clubs based on some ‘notion’ of whether that spending destabilises league competitiveness……..sounds like the kind of weasel words that always seem to be specifically aimed at city. Explains what’s happening at Chelsea I suppose…..
 
Cobwebcat said:
As I said earlier I don’t go along with CAS being biased either way.

If we believe CAS are biased we might as well throw in the towel with a PL nominated panel.

If we take the blue specs off one guy thought we had done something wrong. The fact that two didn’t makes me think we have a strong case not a water tight case.
Click to expand...
I think the UEFA nominee was almost obliged to champion their case - given each party could nominate one of the panel members of their choice. I’m fairly sure I’ve read unanimous decisions don’t really happen at CAS. The PL panel is different in that the members are selected by the chairman (Rosen ?) who is an eminent Kings Counsel and will behave with absolute integrity.
 
Centurions said:
They took 3 of our scouting staff and they used the log in details of someone that still worked for us, no "hacking" as such took place. Just unauthorised access (and I'm still not accepting that they're one and the same :) ) over an 8 month period.
Click to expand...
Still nothing to do with those who remain on our payroll

They’re dippers now
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.