PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

You need to lighten up sunshine. I'm fully aware of the implications of putting certain ideas into print on banners, and no I wouldn't expect anyone at the club to be particularly in favour of something of that nature. Speaking of bizarre, that doesn't explain Vicky's view that the media are no more biased against City than any other club though.
I would think that the fact you are posting what she said on this site tells you exactly why she would keep her cards close to her chest on the clubs real thoughts on media bias.
 
I see that mentalist behind Football is Fixed is claiming he has recordings from yesterday at OT between VAR the ref and commentators.

Whoever at City has been speaking to this loon and let him put on his bio that he works for the group needs their bumps felt.
 
I would think that the fact you are posting what she said on this site tells you exactly why she would keep her cards close to her chest on the clubs real thoughts on media bias.
She doesn't work for the club anymore so what's the problem? I've alluded to this story before on here but never mentioned who said it because she was employed by the club at the time. What next? That none of our ITKs are allowed to share info that they get from the club?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I never met her but, from the outside what I saw was she wasn't delivering it's fair to say what I or many fans wanted from her position.

I assume however, her output was what the club wanted as she was around for a long time.

My impression disingenuous or not was that she was 'in for an easy life' and didn't want to jump in the vipers nest and cause herself any stress.
Your impression is totally wrong
If you knew anything about the job Vicky did at City you wouldn't be accusing her of choosing an easy life, far from it, her job was every waking hour, she didn't get a proper break The club were reluctant to see her leave but, appreciated her reasons. I wouldn't rule out for a return for her in the future in some role
 
How can you disagree with us both? Stefan thinks we will be found to have failed to cooperate and I think we will successfully defend that charge. What position are you taking that is neither of those?
He thinks you are right and anyone who disagrees with you is right too.

It’s clear as mud.
 
I genuinely would like to thank all the legal eagles, and chaps in the trade, who have taken the time to pass on information and opinion on this subject. I have read many pages on here and the knowledge submitted has been top notch.
Just one slight question.... When the final judgement has been made, will you lawyers be billing me per post read, or on a general hourly rate? ;)
Just sign on the line and stop asking questions.
By the hour and you’re on the clock now.
Sign.
 
Your impression is totally wrong
If you knew anything about the job Vicky did at City you wouldn't be accusing her of choosing an easy life, far from it, her job was every waking hour, she didn't get a proper break The club were reluctant to see her leave but, appreciated her reasons. I wouldn't rule out for a return for her in the future in some role
That suggests you have some inner knowledge of her, which I fully take on board but, I can only comment from a fan and outsider role.
 
Your impression is totally wrong
If you knew anything about the job Vicky did at City you wouldn't be accusing her of choosing an easy life, far from it, her job was every waking hour, she didn't get a proper break The club were reluctant to see her leave but, appreciated her reasons. I wouldn't rule out for a return for her in the future in some role
True. Just because I disagreed with her view that there was no media bias against us, doesn't mean I don't think she's done a good job at the club overall.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.