PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

The process is confidential.

I don’t understand why some city fans think him being tight lipped is a sign we’ll do well as much as I don’t understand why opposition fans think it’s the sign of a coverup.

It’s just confidential, so he can’t talk about it.
The PL have learned their lesson from the UEFA investigation where officials kept blabbing and undermined their own case in the end. Actually I thought Masters performed much better this time and seemed quite confident. He had prepared much better than for the last Committee.
 
It’s no wonder that previous successful candidates turned down their job offers for Masters’ role; although if you step back it’s actually pretty astonishing that people go to the trouble of applying for a job like that, with all the prep involved, all the emotional energy that’s required to be part of that process, with all the opportunities the role could present, and after being offered the role they turn it down like it’s working a few weekend shifts part time at the local.

Presumably they sought assurances that were not forthcoming.
When you're experienced enough, you can often smell a rat's nest at 90 paces.
 
Just been on another forum discussing ffp according to one poster its common knowledge that Citys owners buy millions of City merchandise to get round ffp. This us because it's a well known fact that City dont have enough supporters to buy the amount of merchandise sold lol
Did they also buy up all the spuds tickets for the Friday night game because we could never sell this out
 
He also said City were found guilty by UEFA but it was time barred !

He thinks City will have all their records wiped we will be in the conference league and sold as our owners will be banned from football lol.

I didnt realise just who many knobheads there are lol
Is he a twelve year old Liverpool/ ushited fan?
 
Fair enough - I do believe at least 4 have been asked for further clarifications though. You're probably right - wishful thinking.

Maybe those are the ones who lost between 15 and 105 million and so need to provide future forecasts and proof of equity funding? But why so coy? Just say it.

(The PL, not you) :)
 
So there is a date set for the hearing but they are not telling when
Julius Nicholson:
[after the PM's surprising resignation] I can't believe it. That was not the date.

Malcolm Tucker:
You can say that again.

Julius Nicholson:
I was given the incorrect date, rather than the date was changed or the original date was not the actual date.

Malcolm Tucker:
Yeah, I f***ing know that.
 
Why would you post a random, anonymous liverpool loving wanker on here? He only seems to post infrequently and it all appears to be wrong anyway.

To demonstrate what the PL & media agenda is:

Light a fire, fan the flames, infect people with rage, make them rabid and keep at it till the crazies unleash their vitriol on our fans.. much like that kid after the Huddersfield game.

Its not getting resolved within the panel. This hateful poison will likely stay for generations.
 
So there is a date set for the hearing but they are not telling when
Clearly a PR move after the Everton and Forest charges yesterday.

What he's said basically means, "The case will eventually be resolved so by default there is a date the verdict will be delivered, but we don't know when it'll be resolved so we don't know what the date is yet".
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top