dadnlad
Well-Known Member
Megabus £20 and M1 openFFP said he ain’t allowed to spend any money!
Maybe he could get the bus? -:)
Megabus £20 and M1 openFFP said he ain’t allowed to spend any money!
Maybe he could get the bus? -:)
Blue tinted glasses mate. We all wear them.With all that money youd think hed have anti reflection coating on his specs
And it looks like a knitted tie as well.With all that money youd think hed have anti reflection coating on his specs
Back in September 2010 I got talking to a man who worked for a promotions company in Cheadle. This guy showed me photos he'd taken of Spain being presented with the World Cup and he couldn't have been any closer apart from being on the podium itself. He said the company not only organised the marketing, corporate hospitality etc for the tournament but the ticketing which obviously explained him having excellent seats. I asked if England would be getting the 2018 WC he shook his head and said no it's going to Russia. He explained that FIFA wanted to see a legacy in countries that hold the WC this included new or improved stadia, top notch infrastructure, world class communications,top class transport links and taking it into new territory. He said with England all these were already in place and there would be no evidence of FIFA leaving that legacy. In December 2010 FIFA announced the countries to hold the WC would be Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022. My long winded point is a lot in football is preordained, when it comes to finance there is no restrictions on spend when FIFA are to benefit but they can be pretty rigid when they don't.Fifa can’t understand why TV companies don’t want to spend a fortune on a product that’ll air in the middle of the night… maybe they should have thought about that when they awarded the tournament - down under. Nothing against awarding it to Australia and New Zealand but they should have factored in the consequences for European TV audiences… then again they are the same fuckwits who awarded Qatar a World Cup without understanding the summer temperatures!
If he's lucky he might win one title if he can play until he is 50 years old with the Dippers , or he could fill his own personal trophy cabinet to the brim and choose us ,and quite sure any salary cap would not effect the sponsorships and endorsements with the likes of Nike, Samsung , Breitling and others , i know it has been estimated he is recieving £200m over 5 years from Nike , which is probably incuded in the £850k a week the media state he earns.I think there is also underlying hope that with a salary cap, the best players will go back to choosing one of the “history” clubs
For example, Haaland would never have chosen City over the beautiful European royalty club that is a bastion of light in the world Liverpool. If both had to offer roughly the same wage, he’d choose them every time, right?