I wonder if the Prem would like this to go away sooner rather than later due to the possible takeover of the scum by Chelsea Jim or sheikh jism ? The Prem are possibly going to have to look the other way and/or change some rules soon to allow the scum to "compete" they won't want City's lawyers looking at this, and using it against them.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
BlueMoonz1977
Well-Known Member
What has happened to the delayed white paper in regards to how football should be governed in this country.
Not heard anything about it since the paper got delayed and the PL tried acting like they could run the ship by throwing out the charges at us and some other token ones at others
Not heard anything about it since the paper got delayed and the PL tried acting like they could run the ship by throwing out the charges at us and some other token ones at others
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
I wish they’d just have done with it and give us a points deduction so the players no what they are playing with to start a season. This team is that good they’d still comfortably finish in the top four.
The farcical thing about this is the Premier league can bring charges, then isn’t confident enough in itself to then decide it can come to a verdict and deliver a sanction. Having to put together an independent panel to decide how it applies it’s own rule book shows how flakey this is.
These challenges by City mean that it could take a further 2-4 years to reach some form of verdict. It could get to the point where a decision is made to punish a club on accounts that were filed nearly 20 years ago when this gets done. It’s not a witch hunt though.
The farcical thing about this is the Premier league can bring charges, then isn’t confident enough in itself to then decide it can come to a verdict and deliver a sanction. Having to put together an independent panel to decide how it applies it’s own rule book shows how flakey this is.
These challenges by City mean that it could take a further 2-4 years to reach some form of verdict. It could get to the point where a decision is made to punish a club on accounts that were filed nearly 20 years ago when this gets done. It’s not a witch hunt though.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,637
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Am I reading this wrong or does this mean we shouldn’t be punished for breaching rules that didn’t exist until after we breached them?? In which case fucking obviously
That what I think. How can you be charged of breaking rules that werent there.
SkyBlueFlux
Well-Known Member
What has happened to the delayed white paper in regards to how football should be governed in this country.
Not heard anything about it since the paper got delayed and the PL tried acting like they could run the ship by throwing out the charges at us and some other token ones at others
It came out a couple of weeks later and was on the front page of the BBC Sport page. I know because I commented on it at the time.
I was hoping it would go further personally. The whitepaper has the kind non-controversial suggestions you’d expect but nothing ground-breaking. It announces the plan to introduce an independent regulator that will “improve financial resilience” and “ensure the appropriateness of owners and their source of wealth”. Talked a lot about protecting fans and club heritage. I’m paraphrasing, but it was all quite vague and banal.
Maybe an independent regulator will remove some of the biases we currently see against different types of ownership models but I’m not holding my breath.
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 27,986
You can't.That what I think. How can you be charged of breaking rules that werent there.
I hadn't realised this was actually the case till today.
Ammeter hour at the PL.
They’re going to use a device for measuring current for an hour?You can't.
I hadn't realised this was actually the case till today.
Ammeter hour at the PL.
Why only an hour?
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
That what I think. How can you be charged of breaking rules that werent there.
You can't, which is why City are 100 per cent confident this will all bite the dust and finally be put to bed.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,637
- Team supported
- Manchester City
You can't, which is why City are 100 per cent confident this will all bite the dust and finally be put to bed.
So if that's the case I would say the pl 'management' arent fit for purpose. How can you make such a school boy error ? Even I know you cant be charged if the rules weren't there !! Are the pl really that thick and amateurish
Hopefully we will see the pl investigate dipperpool fro their 50million to improve their dump which never happen
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Battery power in kw hours, after all we are now hybrid driven with 23 percent non oil ownership.They’re going to use a device for measuring current for an hour?
Why only an hour?