he’s not wrong.Saw something on twitter that actually makes sense for once:
It’ll be glossed over by the haters, just like when they say “115 charges” and you point out that they are based on doctored hacked emails.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
It’ll be glossed over by the haters, just like when they say “115 charges” and you point out that they are based on doctored hacked emails.
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Many posters don’t like angry Kaz!Forgot to say that i think the prem have made us more determined to win this season, a fuck you cunts , little did they know it would drive us on to a possible treble , they made the players and pep angry and you dont like angry city
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
How should we all feel if the premier manage to scrape together a diluted form of guilt? A “pinch” if you may.
How can we accept ‘football rules’ only brought in to stop a certain club while protecting others?
It will never end, city fans will always have to defend the club. When people get jealous and twisted they don’t recognise a fair and unbiased approach.
Financial rules constantly in motion to try and snare city. An immoral media operation slick and quick to attack anything that is not the populist approach.
All of this effort to discredit and destroy is based on skin tone and a misguided sense of historical superiority.
Competing is wrong. That’s why we are here. City didn’t listen, refused to accept being an also ran in the rigged football pyramid.
Football fans deserve better. The hyenas in the media do not determine right from wrong. Report the facts, don’t twist the narrative.
Stand proud and loud blues. All we did wrong is not play their game.
How can we accept ‘football rules’ only brought in to stop a certain club while protecting others?
It will never end, city fans will always have to defend the club. When people get jealous and twisted they don’t recognise a fair and unbiased approach.
Financial rules constantly in motion to try and snare city. An immoral media operation slick and quick to attack anything that is not the populist approach.
All of this effort to discredit and destroy is based on skin tone and a misguided sense of historical superiority.
Competing is wrong. That’s why we are here. City didn’t listen, refused to accept being an also ran in the rigged football pyramid.
Football fans deserve better. The hyenas in the media do not determine right from wrong. Report the facts, don’t twist the narrative.
Stand proud and loud blues. All we did wrong is not play their game.
Last edited:
feelymcfeel
Well-Known Member
World class.The Gaul of these people
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Who me ! Pussycat that swears a lot , lolMany posters don’t like angry Kaz!
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
He's not wrong but he hasn't gone back far enough. The process started in the early 1980's, when the "big" clubs (including his own, Spurs) blackmailed the Football League, via the threat of a breakaway, to end the ticket money sharing agreement.he’s not wrong.
It’ll be glossed over by the haters, just like when they say “115 charges” and you point out that they are based on doctored hacked emails.
That saw visiting teams get 25% of the gate money, which was far and away the biggest revenue stream at that time. That meant a club getting 60,000 fans at a game, effectively had to give away 15,000 tickets.
Imagine the impact of revenue sharing on a visiting club that regularly got gates of fewer than 30,000. It basically levels the income between the two clubs. Following the ending of that, the 60k club was bringing in twice the revenue of the 30k club.
Look at the list of league winners before 1982 and compare it to the list after 1982, to see the impact.
TedofChume
Well-Known Member
I've been preparing a website detailing all of this grotesque hypocrisy and mis reporting of the UEFA'S FFP case, its taking longer than I thought, if anyone wants a preview to help fact check and comment please DM me.He's not wrong but he hasn't gone back far enough. The process started in the early 1980's, when the "big" clubs (including his own, Spurs) blackmailed the Football League, via the threat of a breakaway, to end the ticket money sharing agreement.
That saw visiting teams get 25% of the gate money, which was far and away the biggest revenue stream at that time. That meant a club getting 60,000 fans at a game, effectively had to give away 15,000 tickets.
Imagine the impact of revenue sharing on a visiting club that regularly got gates of fewer than 30,000. It basically levels the income between the two clubs. Following the ending of that, the 60k club was bringing in twice the revenue of the 30k club.
Look at the list of league winners before 1982 and compare it to the list after 1982, to see the impact.
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
No we cant accept any sort of pinch , we did that once before and look how far that got usHow should we all feel if the premier manage to scrape together a diluted form of guilt? A “pinch” if you may.
How can we accept ‘football rules’ only brought in to stop a certain club while protecting others?
It will never end, city fans will always have to defend the club. When people get jealous and twisted they don’t recognise a fair and unbiased approach.
Financial rules constantly in motion to try and snare city. A moral media operation slick and quick to attack anything that is not the populist approach.
All of this effort to discredit and destroy is based on skin tone and a misguided sense of historical superiority.
Competing is wrong. That’s why we are here. City didn’t listen, refused to accept being an also ran in the rigged football pyramid.
Football fans deserve better. The hyenas in the media do not determine right from wrong. Report the facts, not twist the narrative.
Stand proud and loud blues. All we did wrong is not play their game.
No we go on the attack and end this witch hunt once n for all
Totally agree – the club can accept nothing but complete absolution!No we cant accept any sort of pinch , we did that once before and look how far that got us
No we go on the attack and end this witch hunt once n for all
We then should demand damages from the PL!
And not to mention the ITV documentary (was it World in Action) about matchday tickets, that investigated United... matchday tickets were being sold from the cafe on the corner for over three times face value (was it Pete the Greek?) and the show basically said the club were actually giving them to the cafe... why sell a ticket for face value when you could sell them for 3x that and split it out, so the club were effectively selling the tickets for twice face value... that got swept under the carpet!He's not wrong but he hasn't gone back far enough. The process started in the early 1980's, when the "big" clubs (including his own, Spurs) blackmailed the Football League, via the threat of a breakaway, to end the ticket money sharing agreement.
That saw visiting teams get 25% of the gate money, which was far and away the biggest revenue stream at that time. That meant a club getting 60,000 fans at a game, effectively had to give away 15,000 tickets.
Imagine the impact of revenue sharing on a visiting club that regularly got gates of fewer than 30,000. It basically levels the income between the two clubs. Following the ending of that, the 60k club was bringing in twice the revenue of the 30k club.
Look at the list of league winners before 1982 and compare it to the list after 1982, to see the impact.