remember arthur mann
Well-Known Member
Child exploitation, that'll be another charge !Oh Erling Haaland, I think we should pay you some more.
Child exploitation, that'll be another charge !Oh Erling Haaland, I think we should pay you some more.
not if keep missing sitters like last night,Oh Erling Haaland, I think we should pay you some more.
Fuckin joke isn't it.View attachment 80665
Manchester united have lost £230m over the last 3 years.
Manchester united are trying to sign Harry Kane, Declan Rice and Mason Mount.
FFP ladies and gentlemen.
I can’t be the only one that doesn’t want them to drop the charges as then we’ll get accused of paying them off. I want everything investigated and everything cleared. I want to see a full verdict so we can ram it down the throat of the bitter fuckers who say we are guilty.
Lost me at FIFAIgnorance,one eyed wishful thinking and stupidity is off the scale there.
Charges dropped and we have paid them off.I can’t be the only one that doesn’t want them to drop the charges as then we’ll get accused of paying them off. I want everything investigated and everything cleared. I want to see a full verdict so we can ram it down the throat of the bitter fuckers who say we are guilty.
The recourse to law is on very narrow grounds, basically irregularity in the process.I get your point and I don’t think that what you write is in any way wrong within the rules of the sport, but I think that there is a pathway to appeal and that appeal is to the court of law.
Football clubs are businesses and businesses are protected by a whole raft of laws that are wide ranging and well established. I do understand PL can do whatever they like within their rules, and that the first recourse must always be to those rules as a higher body would rightly expect that, but those rules must ultimately accord with the laws that protect all businesses as the PL, as powerful as it is as a sport governing body, can’t operate a system that sits outside the law itself.
UEFA managed it, despite being told by CAS at the halfway stage (CAS1) that they were mounting an unfair hearing. The CAS verdict in every case began “There is no evidence that…”I can understand all of the above. I am convinced they have no evidence so unless something new comes to light It won’t matter who they appoint or how it’s interpreted. How can you assertion guilt without any evidence?