dadnlad
Well-Known Member
they know and we know slowly but surely ffp is collapsing like a pack of cards
once city sorted it'll be binned and our fault it's not workable
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
once city sorted it'll be binned and our fault it's not workable
they know and we know slowly but surely ffp is collapsing like a pack of cards
once city sorted it'll be binned and our fault it's not workable
Be interesting how the premier ffp treat chelsea with Fenway not happy and Gill the mover in everything ffp! I posted before if Chelsea get champs league and Liverpool or rags don't get top four I can see them deducting points from Chelsea
Rory Bluelow
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 May 2014
- Messages
- 1,992
Sadly it’s a revolving door for these fuckers, he’ll fall on his feet somewhere…hopefully a long way from football.If anybody looks seriously at his role and what has happened under his watch, they will realise that he is spineless and a pure lackie.
He may well get well paid , because the type of people who will employ him are looking for an arselicker and maleable individual who has few genuine pricinciples.
As I said before - fuck him the spineless twat.
Unlikely to be banned. They settled the existing issue. So any FFP charge now will be a cash settlement in due course.
I hope the Mail are tapping you up for a proper article this weekend because the article they've published today rehashing your interview on TalkSport doesn't really do you or your arguments any justice.
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,543
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I hope the Mail are tapping you up for a proper article this weekend because the article they've published today rehashing your interview on TalkSport doesn't really do you or your arguments any justice.
Doubt there is the slightest prospect of that.
Doubt there is the slightest prospect of that.
Really? He's writen a few articles for the mail before.
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 16,543
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Really? He's writen a few articles for the mail before.
I have obviously missed them. Not a fan of the Mail and their content.
HalfwayUpTheKippax
Well-Known Member
Top Marx for EngelsTop marks for Engel
Hard to reconcile FFP and charges against City when you see those figures.
Not only are City's gross and net transfer spends better than our competitors but we are the most successful football club in the period, now generating the highest revenues. Other clubs looking to emulate our success are trying to buy into our model both on and off the field.
The 115 charges against City took years to bring and not one has been proven so far after even more time. None of this reflects well on the PL as the undue influence of certain teams in red continues to emerge. Their hegemony is waning and they are finding themselves restricted by the same rules put in place to stop City.
Manchester City and CFG are exemplars for world football and business yet the PL still have 115 charges of breaches of FFP against City. Other clubs will be desperate to hear their details so they can copy.
Unless the PL can prove City have broken legal or accounting rules, their best outcome to avoid further embarrassment is for the independant regulator to be appointed, revise the governance and rules of the PL and instigate a review of FFP rules. This way the PL can walk away on some pretense be it no longer relevany, time lapsed or by making scapegoats.
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
Hard to reconcile FFP and charges against City when you see those figures.
Not only are City's gross and net transfer spends better than our competitors but we are the most successful football club in the period, now generating the highest revenues. Other clubs looking to emulate our success are trying to buy into our model both on and off the field.
The 115 charges against City took years to bring and not one has been proven so far after even more time. None of this reflects well on the PL as the undue influence of certain teams in red continues to emerge. Their hegemony is waning and they are finding themselves restricted by the same rules put in place to stop City.
Manchester City and CFG are exemplars for world football and business yet the PL still have 115 charges of breaches of FFP against City. Other clubs will be desperate to hear their details so they can copy.
Unless the PL can prove City have broken legal or accounting rules, their best outcome to avoid further embarrassment is for the independant regulator to be appointed, revise the governance and rules of the PL and instigate a review of FFP rules. This way the PL can walk away on some pretense be it no longer relevany, time lapsed or by making scapegoats.
It’s a desperate move by the Premier league to try and nail City for accounts 14 years ago. This is when Financial Fair Play was not being used in the Premier League and many football administrators were interpreting new rule books and guidelines that were coming into play. Yet they will allow the likes of United to take a fine when they probably knew what spending they would be doing would break their balance sheet. Chelsea are also budgeting for what ever sanctions will come their way with their transfer activity as well, they ain’t talking about stripping titles and demotions for any of the two mentioned teams.
The challenges and time scale of what ever verdict is reached as far as City goes, means that their could still be arguments and awaiting of sanctions nearly two decades after the first accounts that the Premier League are saying are wrong were filed. It doesn’t make the Premier League look very competent at enforcing its own rule book.