Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 16,272
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
So that would suggest we're not going to get a seat on that board this time around?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Centurions
Well-Known Member
I fail to see why that would suggest any such thing?So that would suggest we're not going to get a seat on that board this time around?
Destroy your enemies by making "friends" of them.Just makes me think that the our owners/leaders take a different (more strategic) approach to matters than we fans would prefer/think/understand.
Most of us loathe the G-14 and especially the red-shirt members from the PL and want to see out club 'go to war' with them
Here it seems that we are seeing another sign that our management are becoming 'part of the fabric' and finding a 'peaceful' way to take control
Pablo ZZZ Peroni
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 May 2014
- Messages
- 2,486
In theory he should get the support of other PL clubs. If he is 1 of the 7 elected to the board from the 9 candidates, it is safe to assume he has their support. If he isn't elected then clearly we remain pariahs.So that would suggest we're not going to get a seat on that board this time around?
All clubs work out of self-interest. It is in the interest of the other PL clubs to have a PL representative on the executive board.
We still work with the Big 6 when it suits us and them for PL matters. For example the Big 6 wanted an increase in their share of the international tv rights as part of the PL deal. It was 6 v 14 at first and lots of backwards and forwards before a compromise was reached and we got more money.
Prior to Super League fiasco, Woodward and Soriano worked together at the ECA pushing for a greater share of the UEFA TV deal. It doesn;t mean we don't we still hate the fuckers though.
Last edited:
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
what part did woodward take tea boy
Prior to Super League fiasco, Woodward and Soriano worked together at the ECA pushing for a greater share of the UEFA TV deal. It doesn;t mean we don't we still hate the fuckers though.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
Why?So that would suggest we're not going to get a seat on that board this time around?
I assume because it's seen as an organisation that primarily meets the needs of the biggest clubs.Why not? There are 11 PL clubs attending, maybe the question should be why are the other nine not there?
Soriano is the only PL rep standing for election.
A rival for mid-sized and smaller clubs was launched this year, and one club has just been thrown out of the ECA for being a member. I've not seen a members list online, but some of the other PL clubs were reported to have joined, and quite a few were at the launch.
mancity dan
Well-Known Member
Interesting.
Asa's left peg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 3,984
- Location
- Sandbach via Rusholme
- Team supported
- Some team in the CFG
It's a shame that people who do these still don't know the reason why we ended our cooperation of the 'confidential' investigation by UEFA and felt justified in doing so. UEFA's investigation into the leaks still hasn't started I believe.
Interesting.
Seems like the ultimate bedwetter. The PL need proof - no shit.