Ray bloody Purchase
Well-Known Member
Well, this may not be seen as the absolute correct answer to your question, as the rules may have been different, but this was the statement put out when Leicester failedSo I said the other day Simon Jordon is saying it’s very harsh because it’s false or misleading accounting and the accounts have been signed off so there will be arguments on both sides on here was told that’s rubbish it’s just they lost too much money.
I know Simon is a bit of gob on stick and the above position is contrary to his position with us and I think. He misleads people e.g with related party when he knows the rules from business even tho he failed eventually.
So people said they have been punished for loosing too much money not false account or whatever you want to call it
However how did they think they had passed are there therefore some parallels with us in terms of grey areas if we have done something wrong that is
This was taken from an article in the guardian dated: Feb 2018, it was written by the conn man, so I am not posting a link:
“……….The EFL and Leicester announced the £3.1m settlement in identical statements, which gave little detail about the issues considered. The statements made clear that: “In reaching the settlement, the EFL acknowledges that the club did not make any deliberate attempt to infringe the rules or to deceive and that the dispute arose out of genuine differences of interpretation of the rules between the parties.”
This is what pisses me off about leicester, the line “both statements gave little detail about the issues concerned”, and then there was the complete lack of moaning from levy when Leicester won the league ahead of spurs,