PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Rags - average club, with minor periods of success, made money off exploiting a tradgedy, poisioning local school kids and ssvy commercial selling when telly became business, Sky was their savipur in the 90s and without it chances are they would have won less.

Red scouse - yo yo club with little success, won thw lottery and got bankrolled big time, used money and then investment driven status they built to buy the best set up a sytem oof play that could be passes on from mqnager to manager and plater to player and dominate the game. (sound familiar, bar the complete opposite fan bases the model is the same as ours, they should be proud they pioneered such instead of crying like cunts)

The arse - Famous club in early years of football, then so-so with moments revived once bankrolled by (blood) diamond trade to moderate success in the late 80s early 90s, then back to so-so club.

The formation of the champions league and the 4 places have skewed everything as it gave those 3 and any other an added financial and commercial boost to carry on dominating the top places.

Everton, villa & the rest were complicite in voting for their stifling suggestion out of fear of our take over and now wil lreap what they sowed while.those 3 cunts are commercially ok enough to still have a leg up
 
Last edited:
Dribble said:
As things stand, all that's happened is an accusation's been made, charges lodged, but no supporting evidence disclosed to the defendant.

From my experience that would never happen in any kind of civil, criminal or tribunal case.

How can City defend themselves based on accusations without evidence disclosure?

The PL have jumped the gun & put the cart before the horse after being panicked by government plans to form an IFR.
Click to expand...
Do we know the Premier League haven’t provided City with any evidence or is this just an assumption? There seems a widespread assumption that it is City dragging things out
 
IcriedwhenTueartleft said:
I would imagine that all evidence is disclosed in advance so City know exactly what is in front of them. The PL cannot just turn up on day one and say “Here’s Gladys who worked in the laundry room & in 2012 she saw Khaldoon handing Mancini £2m in cash & heard him say “FFS Bobby boy,don’t tell anybody””
Click to expand...
If Gladys can keep her big mouth shut we might be OK.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Are you saying there aren't just three issues at the heart of this? Well obviously we don't know with 100% certainty but the evidence even in the wording of the charges seems to indicate that there are, as they specifically mention them.
Click to expand...

Partly. No there aren't 3, there are 5. But that's semantics, my point is broader than that.

'Issues', is a good word. I've read your posts, and I totally get your logic, and you have been careful with your language.

However it has somehow created a bit of false impression, that other posters have run away with a bit. And that's what I am really responding to.

In that a number claim there are only 3 charges, and 112 either don't matter, have been dismissed, are irrelevant, or whatever other version of taking that away.

There are 5 'groups' of charges, or issues, sure. But there are still multiple charges. If we are found guilty of any one of those groups, whatever number is in it will be the scale of the verdict, and will be shouted from the roofrops. Likewise, clearing a group clears a whole bunch, and the scale should be noted.

The group/issue with the non-cooperation is probably the most subjective one.
 
Last edited:
lonestay said:
The Prem want to keep this all in house with their Kangaroo court and officials who support red teams , but it cant, and wont be that way. They are accusing some very big political powerful people of fraud on a grand scale. The Prem see it as a football matter the people accused wont. Are the prem so thick and stupid that they cant see the ramifications of their actions ? This will go beyond football ,the Sheikh and/or Khaldoon only have to move some contracts around and take some away from the government give them to other countries, and Sunak will make this his number one priority, because he cant afford the country losing investment at a time when he needs as much funds in the country to try and buy votes in a looming election .
Click to expand...
Kangaroo court ? last thing we need is some drunk weirdos aussi verdict.
 
rickmcfc said:
That’s no different to me going around saying that Eamon Homes is a monkey eating lettuce with tentacles as fingers. It’s complete factless allegations and unless I could prove the above, then there’s nothing to answer. Why haven’t City gone and asked for proof and a hearing on said 115 alleged offences so it can be played out in court etc?

That’s the part that baffles me. Nothing is happening
Click to expand...
You dont know nothing is happening behind the scenes ? But if the Prem have evidence that we have fraudulently entered accounts, then by law they have to report us to the relevant authority's otherwise the prem are breaking the law themselves , they have at this point not done so, so that would lead you to conclude they have no evidence or proof .
 
eastmanc said:
Why so aggressive. OK your not being negative I thought it come over like that. Sorry you feel so offended. Fucking hell.
Click to expand...

Sorry mate, I didn't think I was being aggressive, but also just had a few responses in a row, and unintentionally combined my reactions to them all in that. I dial it back a notch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.