PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[LongsightM13]

@robbohuyton


Why does almost everyone that's had anything to do with @theanfieldwrap look like they enjoy the smell of their own farts? Wasn't that the same channel that sky sports news bitter came from, Melissa Reddy?

He’s the biggest dick of the lot amid some extremely fierce competition

 

[KS55]

Remember, City were the only prem club (or was it top six?) to vote for an independent regulator, I guess because they don’t trust the PL.

 

[Holcombe bloo]

No. They used the login of an existing employee.

But it's irrelevant because (as I understand it) once that settlement is agreed and signed, there's no further civil or criminal recourse unless there's a specific provision in the settlement agreement.

We might of but The prem / fa didn’t settle anything, nothing to stop them looking into it if they didn’t know at the time? Or the police for that matter

 

[Holcombe bloo]

Get ready for 25/26 back to our roots !

Playing Stockport County away, singing, “ Champions of Europe, you’ll never sing that “

Kicked out of PL (demoted to League One)

I think it’s a certainty. I mean Barnsley kicked out of FA Cup for ACCIDENTALLY playing an ineligible player.

Surely that’s less of an offence than City using ill gotten funds to buy, and play, superstars who could not have been afforded otherwise

Have you dropped an acid?

 

[ayrshire_blue]

Remember, City were the only prem club (or was it top six?) to vote for an independent regulator

Has this ever been confirmed? I've seen it mentioned on here, but never read or heard this from an actual source confirming it to be the case.

 

[KS55]

Has this ever been confirmed? I've seen it mentioned on here, but never read or heard this from an actual source confirming it to be the case.

Er…dunno.

 

[johnnytapia]

It was 23 years after the Computer Misuse Act though. And GDPR has been around for years. My first freelance contract in 2004 involved GDPR.

Gordon Davies Public Relations ?
@gordondaviesmoustache

 

[Bald fraud]

Think this will be us basically saying if our stuff isn’t time barred then neither should there's be. Absolutely nothing will come of it

 

[Spanishbob]

Step away from the bar Bob. :-)

Did and fell on my arse. Bloody strong Spanish beer you should know. Hic

 

[Moss Side's Finest]

I have often wonder why the rest weren't released. Could he have been working for the American owners ?

It's simple. There weren't any other clubs hacked, it was just a cover story. If they announced only city was hacked then there would have been awkward questions about why it was only city and more importantly, who funded/requested the hack. Saying it was widespread meant that those awkward questions were never asked. Then as time passed and City took the heat, everyone else forgot about the apparent other hacks. It was quite clever really.

Make no mistake about it, the hack was requested by at least one of our main rivals, either domestic or European. Think bayern, liverpool, united and you wouldn't be far wrong.