PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[domalino]

Hardly. It depends on the settlement. Full payoff and no job as a manager for six months (or whatever) or partial payoff and no work restriction. It’s a contract between two parties that they agree to and abide by. Mancini had a contract with Inter with three years left when he was sacked so there would have been a lot of intense discussions to settle that one!

No.

Either you’re not fired, carry on as an employee on gardening leave on full salary.

Or you receive a pay off (whatever the amount) and your employment is terminated.


No employer can make you sign up to a period of unemployment. Even non-compete clauses are incredibly hard to enforce.

 

[Gordyola]

Except person's at home are not duty bound to protect their property by locking doors/windows etc - there is no law in place for homeowners to do so. There is legislation in place for businesses with reference to protection of data and the use of computer systems. The two situations are worlds apart. That being said, it's still cheating by Liverpool FC.

It’s is also the responsibility of an individual under GDPR to abide by the legislation Knowing accessing the data with true knowledge that you are no longer entitled to is an offence

 

[Gordyola]

It’s definitely the blue shirts v the reds

City v United
Chelsea v Arsenal
Everton v Liverpool

Everton fans are livid about how corrupt it is and hopefully they see it rather then it’s ok if City/ Chelsea get punished.

Need the narrative to change, why is what Everton done so wrong, what is wrong with investment.

The best and most even competition in the world would be all clubs having the same budget, obviously unlikely to happen.

Having Saudi or someone blowing the competition out of the window and paying £1 million a week to the 23 best footballers would not be great.

But there is a middle ground where owner investment is allowed up to the turnover of other clubs as long as it is investment and not debt.

That would be great and far better then FFP.

Run the article how much did Everton spend compared to United, A LOT less and now they have 10 points deducted and there was no financial risk to them.

Let’s hope the ones together stay together to fight this as already the media are trying the divide and conquer.

For over a hundred years there was no financial regulation how many clubs went bust? Since the introduction of financial regulation more clubs have gone bust, not saying it is why but what is clear is it doesn’t work
Of course it was introduced to hamstrung the likes of City If we have done a few dodgy things then so what the Sky 4 were just as dodgy getting the UCL introduced to ensure they got massive income that the others couldn’t get or get into the cartel Now their jealousy and lothering of City and their Arab owners is going to wreck the golden goose lf City are found guilty and servly punished it will be the end as I’m sure City will release a maelstrom of information to wreck the PL after all they won’t be part of it anymore It’s the PL as it is today with City or not at all

 

[Gordyola]

Right and Liverpool were liable for that. There is also a requirement on the data owners to have appropriate measures in place to ensure that data is secure, of which we would be liable. Say if that data had been leaked, the people who’s info was on that database would have had a case against us.

We didn’t own the database apparently but would be liable for account management although the database owners might actually do the mechanics we may have notified them that the account should be closed and they hadn’t got around to it This doesn’t excuse the perpetrator of the hack

 

[meltonblue]

We didn’t own the database apparently but would be liable for account management although the database owners might actually do the mechanics we may have notified them that the account should be closed and they hadn’t got around to it This doesn’t excuse the perpetrator of the hack

It wasn’t an account that should have been closed as they were using an existing employees logon to do it.

We did own the database, we didn’t host it though.

 

[Gordyola]

It wasn’t an account that should have been closed as they were using an existing employees logon to do it.

We did own the database, we didn’t host it though.

Well that makes the offence worse
I’ve heard both scenarios though I’m not sure if anyone knows for certain

 

[meltonblue]

Well that makes the offence worse
I’ve heard both scenarios though I’m not sure if anyone knows for certain

It was reported at the time that they were using Rob Newmans account, who was still working for us at the time.

 

[Citizen of Legoland]

It’s is also the responsibility of an individual under GDPR to abide by the legislation Knowing accessing the data with true knowledge that you are no longer entitled to is an offence

I thought this all happened pre GDPR?

 

[I'm Blue]

We’ve been doing this all wrong.
Forget the fancy pants lawyers the scousers have sussed it : )

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

Oh god the hacking thing st!ll. Let it gooooo